Szabo
Posts : 162 Contribution Points : 66938 Forum Reputation : 35 Join date : 2017-04-07 Location : Cornwall, UK.
| Subject: Re: How exactly did Eric "let Brooks go"? Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:07 pm | |
| I'm skimming through the 11k and found the following comments about Brooks Brown from Renee Kinsella's deposition kind of interesting:
"That Renee did not believe Brooks had prior knowledge of the CHS incident because he has a reputation for being a 'male gossiper' and she does not believe that Dylan and Eric would trust him with that information."
"That Renee also advised that she is not surprised that Brooks is on television so much (as a result of this incident), stating 'He's an actor.'" | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: How exactly did Eric "let Brooks go"? Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:27 am | |
| - Szabo wrote:
- I'm skimming through the 11k and found the following comments about Brooks Brown from Renee Kinsella's deposition kind of interesting:
"That Renee did not believe Brooks had prior knowledge of the CHS incident because he has a reputation for being a 'male gossiper' and she does not believe that Dylan and Eric would trust him with that information."
"That Renee also advised that she is not surprised that Brooks is on television so much (as a result of this incident), stating 'He's an actor.'" Almost everyone who knew Brooks pretty much says the same thing. He liked to talk, was a known liar, he liked to fabricate stories to make himself look good or to make himself seem important. Brooks even admits to it. Over the years he has proved that he still hasn't grown out of it. Which is why I don't put much faith in his book. |
|