Modern Humanity and Its Inevitable Collapse

From this article, I will convey a series of facts that demonstrate precisely that modern humanity will only end in Self-Implosion. I ask you to pay attention to all the articles and soon, you will be able to understand a series of important things for the future and the present.
It is important to note that this series of articles is not for sexists, assiduous feminists, egalitarians, vegans, racists, anti-Semites, false conservatives, moralists, empaths, unrealists and victimists. these articles were made for the understanding by people who follow the natural laws that do not stop at a limitation. so if you're not one of those people don't waste your time.


1- Neither Patriarchy nor Matriarchy: Reality.
Much is said that it was with the collapse of patriarchy in recent centuries and the rise of matriarchal civilizations that we have the modern world as it exists. Firstly, it is important to be very cautious about statements like these, as they are not absolute truths. to begin with, it is unquestionable that throughout history, there have been numerous civilizations with patriarchal and matriarchal values, in which all parameters of social life were extended, from the physical to the spiritual, with the divergence between returning to the earth, or the ascent to heaven. however, both systems are essentially limiting. patriarchy does not make women a slave, however much the false patriarchs, mainly coming from the thought of asia minor, try to say the opposite. patriarchy obviously places men as the basis of civilization and imposes a hierarchical condition on women, which was not necessarily exploitative, especially among pagan peoples. however as you can see there are limitations. In matriarchy, there has always been domination by women, as well as in patriarchy by men, over the other sex, proving that any type of limit imposed on people is naturally flawed. another important thing to say is that nature consists of movement, development and evolution. establishing limiting concepts is going against the natural principle itself. there are things in which the man has more basis to accomplish than the woman and things that the woman has more basis to accomplish than the man, however, it is not through imposition, but through experiencing that this will happen. in a maxim this is easily explained: "All laws were made naturally to be broken."

2- Society is the opposite and enemy of social relations.
It seems contradictory, but it is not. all living beings on earth, apart from those born in hierarchical and totalitarian hive systems, where there is no individualism, are tribal. the human being is not superior to any existing animal on the planet and is part of nature just like everyone else. none of them really organize themselves in a macro cosmic way in a group with several sectors with different interests of hundreds of thousands of individuals. in humanity, civilizations have always been born from the conjunction of countless peoples and also from the disproportionate population increase. It is important to note two points here:
- The population increase in the case of humanity will always be an inherent problem, because it does not have sufficiently functional animal predators to balance the population.
- Mixtures between different peoples always end up creating internal disputes that will inevitably collapse with society.
humanity was not made to be equal. we were born into different tribes, on different continents, in different climates. From the moment that the tribes or increased their population and began to unite forming civilizations, there was a huge break in human development, since it is not being born from solid foundations. the most important thing is also that the values of society will always dissociate from the values of the tribe, because in the tribe, there is the microcosmic experience, there is a daily routine normally linked to nature and the living of the individual experience and the same tribe is a coalition even voluntary human beings, which is the opposite of civilization/society whose values are only self-preservation and it closes on people, limiting their experiences to the good of the commanders and the same. therefore, no society or social concept is really functional.

3- The Gods of civilized man are their creations.
You don't have to do much to understand this fact. the very questioning of an already established word, act, concept or idea sparks the understanding of this truth. An example:
Philosophy is known for criticizing everything from ethics to aesthetics, but what if you criticize philosophy itself, what happens? probably the philosophers will go against you in the same way that their critics were against the critics. there is an idolatry on the part of civilized man, of human creations. and this is necessary for civilization, as it sustains itself from them. It is important to point out that no civilization is born from the direct observation of facts, but from the deliberately manipulated interpretation of reality. it is from there that men will draw the bases for the creation of their forms of self-domination. the criticism of the very existence of civilization cannot be carried out, as it will quickly give the answer that it is useless. and that's a fact. nothing that modern human civilization manages to do will really last. plastic, which is one of the most resistant materials that man has managed to make, is consumable by a series of animals and microorganisms. radiation from atomic bombs decays over time, and there are countless plants, fungi and bacteria that consume radiation and regarding our constructions, most of them would not last even 600 years standing. literally, human social life is walking on a void.

4- Modern humanity has no value other than the destructive.
As we have already seen in the 3 previous articles, modern humanity is surrounded by a true self-imposed wall through its own wills when subjugating civilization. this means that his actions do not have as a principle, the coexistence of man with the environment, but rather, his will on non-existent values, which makes him become a falsely supremacist and predatory species. It is important to understand that everything that exists is part of nature, only it is divided into constructive and destructive force, and in this respect, modern humanity is in the destructive force. however, this "destruction" is momentary and limited, because no matter how hard it tries, humanity will not be able to completely destroy the planet. every natural disaster that occurs is a micro renovation, however much humans rebuild afterwards, something new will be born and inevitably what humans did will cease to exist. therefore, for nature, modern humanity is a virus, a disease, a plague, which is being contained. in nature nothing is immediate. everything is slow and gradual. the collapse of civilization will happen in the same way. cities, for example, greatly affect the microclimate of regions. the megalopolis of tokyo in japan, for example, affects the entire region around it, mainly because modern cities were not made to absorb water, but rather they end up retaining heat and creating a series of problems of a climatic nature, which are reflected in the formation of huge storms, droughts and others. as you can see, it is not even necessary to release gases into the atmosphere to have enormous damage, it is civilization itself that does it. apart from the huge patches of microplastic and garbage in the 3 oceans, atlantic, pacific and indic, which are concentrated in huge vortices that are found in them. most of the material that resides in these areas, larger than the state of texas, is microplastic, which is slowly being decomposed. even these huge patches of garbage are not enough to hugely affect the earth as a whole. the planet is slowly purifying itself, through the intensification of disasters, genetic destruction, influence of natural selection on human behavior, among others, causing in the end, humanity to be drastically reduced, through a demographic collapse.

5- Sexuality only exists with natural laws.
The idea of a socially accepted sexual relationship is a dream of almost every man. little do they know that it is actually a trap. that's because sexuality was never really limited to a relationship or anything like that. who imposed this was the man himself, as well as all other ethical laws that have no validity other than collective acceptance. it is naturally not possible to establish a single way of living or experiencing sexuality, and this is where a society will never allow an organic development of it, but in fact, it will always try to control, limit and dominate it . this domination will take place through the values of the society itself, whether it is matriarchal or patriarchal. it doesn't matter which one it is, both will limit sexuality for self-preservation. the focus of civilizations is NEVER THE WELL-BEING OF PEOPLE, BUT YES, THEIR PRESERVATION! this means that nothing, absolutely nothing that society produces or defends, will really be positive for humanity. the idea of limitations even goes against the very principle of natural experience that nature imposes on individuals in order to evolve them. Therefore, a real development, a sexual spontaneity within any civilization is impossible. modern pornography, by making taboo-themed videos, are literally just awakening that limitlessness that people desire but don't have the courage to develop. pornography in this case serves as a mixed form of the two forces: one wants to awaken the unlimited side of sexuality, and the other just propagandizes what society imposes. it goes without saying that what society imposes is more visited, but also the more provocative side, the taboo, the unknown, the unlimited is extremely exciting and is starting to be more sought after.

6- Intellectualism, debates and politics are useless.
All that we mention are generic forms of things that, deep down, are faces of the same coin, of the same essence, in which, it does not match the natural laws. Let's start with intellectualism. When we speak of intellectualism, we are not talking about knowledge linked to the way of life, which is more than necessary for existence on earth, but rather, studies carried out on the conceptions born of the will of the individual or society. it goes without saying that all the literature, lectures and production connected with this aspect is unnecessary and useless. about politics, it is important to point out that natural laws, however much they want to be treated in a political way, cannot be done, mainly because politics involves negotiation and imposition, which natural laws do not need to do, since they are organic and inherent . all political ideologies in the end are actually limited ways of seeing the world, and in essence, they are the same thing, even if in form they may be different. the focus of one's life must be natural laws. and finally, the debates. it goes without saying that the enormous changes throughout history have not come about through debate but through imposition. it is, however, funny to observe that civilization itself makes it clear that debates are useless, as it never really took advantage of them as a basis for its support. ideas actually represent means of transmitting feelings that will only be activated in those who have them. this means that people's interest in the debate has never really been the truth, but what for them is the truth.

7- The Nature's Joker: The Collapse of Civilization.
If you've made it this far, you must have understood that human social life is extremely nihilistic, unrealistic and literally slavish. we have seen that the earth regulates itself through weather, disasters and others. and this is where nature presents its joker against modern humanity. the rise of modernism in a period of rising population is no accident. if there's one thing that modernism is good at doing, it's making relations between the sexes more difficult, complicating the birth rate in the countries that accept it. It is important to note that even countries where modernism is not fully accepted are already liberal in some respect. the future of modern humanity is total chaos due to demographic collapse. This will happen for several reasons:
- Decline in birth rate
- Expansion of radical values in the social/political/religious spectrum
- Increased violence
- Increased potential for disasters
- Cultural modifications
- Accelerationism
- sexual radicalism
- Counter-revolutions
- Pandemics
- Authoritarian governments.
The human population within this century will suffer from the effects of these things, quickly and effectively. the collapse of modern civilization, however, will be the last and will forever mark the end of the human nuclear and aerospace age as we think of it. those who go through this will not have any of the civilizing values and soon, a new humanity will be born. one cannot say how this will happen, the speed or what life will be like after that, but it is almost certain that a technological decline is inevitable.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I always believed that the modern 'humanity' was a failed concept.

Rosie1756 wrote:

I always believed that the modern 'humanity' was a failed concept.

It is something empty whose future is non-existence.

Pekka wrote:

Rosie1756 wrote:

I always believed that the modern 'humanity' was a failed concept.

It is something empty whose future is non-existence.

If something happens to a delusional 'mass human' it is funny even if they appear to be a nice person.

Rosie1756 wrote:

Pekka wrote:

Rosie1756 wrote:

I always believed that the modern 'humanity' was a failed concept.

It is something empty whose future is non-existence.

If something happens to a delusional 'mass human' it is funny even if they appear to be a nice person.

of course it is comical, but on the other hand it is sad, because they have become the majority, despite the fact that it is a majority destined to collapse.

Pekka wrote:

Rosie1756 wrote:

Pekka wrote:

Rosie1756 wrote:

I always believed that the modern 'humanity' was a failed concept.

It is something empty whose future is non-existence.

If something happens to a delusional 'mass human' it is funny even if they appear to be a nice person.

of course it is comical, but on the other hand it is sad, because they have become the majority, despite the fact that it is a majority destined to collapse.

Some things are beyond comical but hilarious and extremely intriguing.

my hope today lies in nature and its final victory over society.  the sacrifice of our ancestors will not be in vain.

What Pekka said in 2007 about democracies being mass delusion systems is becoming more correct all the time now.

Rosie1756 wrote:

What Pekka said in 2007 about democracies being mass delusion systems is becoming more correct all the time now.

always listen to barbarian warriors.