The point of no return

that could be the point of no return right there

JP wrote:

did eric and dylan ever commit an act of violence on anyone in their entire life before columbine?

No, just some vandalism and theft.

Evidently Dylan pushed someone but they only hurt themselves before that day.

JP wrote:

did eric and dylan ever commit an act of violence on anyone in their entire life before columbine?

do verbal assaults count?

Lizpuff wrote:

JP wrote:

did eric and dylan ever commit an act of violence on anyone in their entire life before columbine?

do verbal assaults count?

I want to know more details about the incident when Dan Lab punched Eric in the face, there isn't much about that...

munchkinphone wrote:

Lizpuff wrote:

JP wrote:

did eric and dylan ever commit an act of violence on anyone in their entire life before columbine?

do verbal assaults count?

I want to know more details about the incident when Dan Lab punched Eric in the face, there isn't much about that...

Me too! Except for the fact that it did not hurt at all according to Eric

I’m confused about his relationship with Kristi. Did they have a crush on each other but never went out and she ended up dating Dan and then Nate? Or did Eric just have a crush on her and she only thought of him as a friend. Didn’t Eric call her oozey boo boo ?

I think she liked talking to him and thought he was interesting at least.

I mean why would Eric and Nate fight about her if she wasn't even interested in Eric.. makes no sense, but then again men never does

munchkinphone wrote:

I think she liked talking to him and thought he was interesting at least.

I mean why would Eric and Nate fight about her if she wasn't even interested in Eric.. makes no sense, but then again men never does

They really don’t, and they say women are confusing. Men perplex me a great deal at times.

It seem to have too much of a negative impact on their friendship though.

Sometimes wonder if Dylan put himself out more if he would’ve met someone nice. Looks wise he wasn’t bad and he was smart. I think he was just very shy and an odd ball for that time and place

I remember reading that Kristy liked Eric but he only cared for her as a friend until she was dating Nate. And then he was jealous

Lizpuff wrote:

I remember reading that Kristy liked Eric but he only cared for her as a friend until she was dating Nate.  And then he was jealous

Jeesh Eric...

Wanting what he can’t have

violence is murder

JP wrote:

violence is murder

Murder is violence. You can reverse that and it would be true as well.

JP wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

JP wrote:

People here got a second chance at life and they are blowing it spending time on here instead of enjoying something else.

What do you mean by "second chance"?

of course jesus christ dying for your sins

So you're here to push religion on to us?

if a punch can kill, and i throw it, then it is murder, if you catch my drift

if the police slam you, it is murder.

hence violence is murder

if i defend myself using a gun, i have to become a murderer to defend myself, i dont have to defend myself i can run or hide or let them kill me or kill myself. no one can make you do anything unless you decide to do it, and in that moment you become a murderer and that is the reality. a bunch of murderers telling people what to do.

murderers judging human behavior like gods

turning against ourselves

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

See jp, you are trying to get really fucking deep and edgy, and its annoying as shit.
Maybe you wouldn't be as annoying if you just put it all in one fucking sentence. Can you just do that for me? can you put it all in one big, fucking run on sentence. You can try to go as deeply retarded as you please, but for the love of motherfucking god, keep it in one post, like I do.

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

What? Nobody said anything about killing people over the tampon prank. See this is why I think you're either a troll or you deliberately take drugs before you come and post here.

QuestionMark wrote:

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

What? Nobody said anything about killing people over the tampon prank. See this is why I think you're either a troll or you deliberately take drugs before you come and post here.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I think JP may be referring to me saying that I would have fought back and defended myself if I were the one in that situation. I think I had worded it something like "If that had happened to me I would've lost my shit and attacked."  I also said that I had been raised to defend myself even if it meant having to do it in a violent way.

Either way I certainly didn't say that I would kill someone over a prank. Also I am female, and to my knowledge not a psychopath.

Oh well. I wonder what little tidbits of wisdom JP will hit us with today?

Violence isn't murder

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

What? Nobody said anything about killing people over the tampon prank. See this is why I think you're either a troll or you deliberately take drugs before you come and post here.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I think JP may be referring to me saying that I would have fought back and defended myself if I were the one in that situation. I think I had worded it something like "If that had happened to me I would've lost my shit and attacked."  I also said that I had been raised to defend myself even if it meant having to do it in a violent way.

Either way I certainly didn't say that I would kill someone over a prank. Also I am female, and to my knowledge not a psychopath.

Oh well. I wonder what little tidbits of wisdom JP will hit us with today?

There is a huge difference between punching someone having a prank and murder.

I interpreted this whole question as the turning point, kind of like what Sue talked about, when they decided to do what they did. Not that it was right of course. When they were like "yes, we have to do this, we don't care anymore"

If someone pelted me with tampons I would probably have kicked them. I mean I'm not a big fighter but back then I would have at the very least kicked them...

munchkinphone wrote:

Violence isn't murder

Agreed. I believe this JP person just likes to troll a bit. They seem to like posting random things that make little sense.

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

munchkinphone wrote:

Violence isn't murder

Agreed. I believe this JP person just likes to troll a bit. They seem to like posting random things that don't make much sense.

Remember when we had a "troll" type person and ended up with a trivia game. That was fun... I like trivia games.

Screamingophelia wrote:

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

munchkinphone wrote:

Violence isn't murder

Agreed. I believe this JP person just likes to troll a bit. They seem to like posting random things that don't make much sense.

Remember when we had a "troll" type person and ended up with a trivia game. That was fun... I like trivia games.

I personally think the point of no return was when they got weapons. Eric even said they felt more powerful and more godlike than ever before. They were "too pumped" for the massacre to quit.

Screamingophelia wrote:

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

What? Nobody said anything about killing people over the tampon prank. See this is why I think you're either a troll or you deliberately take drugs before you come and post here.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I think JP may be referring to me saying that I would have fought back and defended myself if I were the one in that situation. I think I had worded it something like "If that had happened to me I would've lost my shit and attacked."  I also said that I had been raised to defend myself even if it meant having to do it in a violent way.

Either way I certainly didn't say that I would kill someone over a prank. Also I am female, and to my knowledge not a psychopath.

Oh well. I wonder what little tidbits of wisdom JP will hit us with today?

There is a huge difference between punching someone having a prank and murder.

If someone pelted me with tampons I would probably have kicked them. I mean I'm not a big fighter but back then I would have at the very least kicked them...

Agreed.  I was taught to never start a fight, but to not back down from one either.  My mom and dad always told us that we had the right to defend ourselves if we had to.  

I will forever be grateful that I was able to grow up knowing that I had parents who would back me up if/when I got into trouble in school for fighting.  Because lets face it, being picked on is a given. Girls can be just a vicious as guys, sometimes worse.  

Also I was always the smallest. Hell I'm 5'1 as an adult. So I was picked on by girls that just assumed because I was so small that I wouldn't fight back. They were always proven wrong.

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

Screamingophelia wrote:

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

What? Nobody said anything about killing people over the tampon prank. See this is why I think you're either a troll or you deliberately take drugs before you come and post here.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I think JP may be referring to me saying that I would have fought back and defended myself if I were the one in that situation. I think I had worded it something like "If that had happened to me I would've lost my shit and attacked."  I also said that I had been raised to defend myself even if it meant having to do it in a violent way.

Either way I certainly didn't say that I would kill someone over a prank. Also I am female, and to my knowledge not a psychopath.

Oh well. I wonder what little tidbits of wisdom JP will hit us with today?

There is a huge difference between punching someone having a prank and murder.

If someone pelted me with tampons I would probably have kicked them. I mean I'm not a big fighter but back then I would have at the very least kicked them...

Agreed.  I was taught to never start a fight, but to not back down from one either.  My mom and dad always told us that we had the right to defend ourselves if we had to.  

I will forever be grateful that I was able to grow up knowing that I had parents who would back me up if/when I got into trouble in school for fighting.  Because lets face it, being picked on is a given. Girls can be just a vicious as guys, sometimes worse.  

Also I was always the smallest. Hell I'm 5'1 as an adult. So I was picked on by girls that just assumed because I was so small that I wouldn't fight back. They were always proven wrong.

I agree. The times I did fight back I got in trouble. That sucked

E and D did try to confront people their junior year to try to end the drama but the younger kids never showed.

Though I can picture this “show down” as Dylan standing there silently with his sunglasses on cracking his knuckles and Eric yelling at them then saying “ok Chris, kick their ass!!”

Screamingophelia wrote:

E and D did try to confront people their junior year to try to end the drama but the younger kids never showed.

Though I can picture this “show down” as Dylan standing there silently with his sunglasses on cracking his knuckles and Eric yelling at them then saying “ok Chris, kick their ass!!”

Being able to trash talk and then actually having to back it up is two totally different things.

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

Screamingophelia wrote:

E and D did try to confront people their junior year to try to end the drama but the younger kids never showed.

Though I can picture this “show down” as Dylan standing there silently with his sunglasses on cracking his knuckles and Eric yelling at them then saying “ok Chris, kick their ass!!”

Being able to trash talk and then actually having to back it up is two totally different things.  

Eric’s bark was worse than his bite.

It’s scary to think, they were so angry and wanted to fight back but it got so escalated they needed weapons and “revenge” it’s a sad situation all around

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

In England, somebody set off a ketchup bomb in a chip shop, it went all over the walls and ceiling.

Ziamber II wrote:

JP wrote:

someone was advocating becoming physically violent and attacking people for throwing tampons with fucking ketchup on them at him, that is pure psychopathy to kill someone for a prank I cannot believe it are you all psychopaths?

In England, somebody set off a ketchup bomb in a chip shop, it went all over the walls and ceiling.

I would have hated being the one who had to clean that mess up.

DooMRebel wrote:

I personally think the point of no return was when they got weapons. Eric even said they felt more powerful and more godlike than ever before. They were "too pumped" for the massacre to quit.

That is a good point. Even if they wanted to back out at that point, where were they gonna get rid of the guns (guns, that mind you, would've been illegal for them to posses and were illegally modified)?

QuestionMark wrote:

DooMRebel wrote:

I personally think the point of no return was when they got weapons. Eric even said they felt more powerful and more godlike than ever before. They were "too pumped" for the massacre to quit.

That is a good point. Even if they wanted to back out at that point, where were they gonna get rid of the guns (guns, that mind you, would've been illegal for them to posses and were illegally modified)?

They probably could of dismantled them and hid them in the forest

A spin off question, what point could one of them have been convinced NOT to do it. What would have had to have happened and who could have talked one of them out of it.

Population Control wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

DooMRebel wrote:

I personally think the point of no return was when they got weapons. Eric even said they felt more powerful and more godlike than ever before. They were "too pumped" for the massacre to quit.

That is a good point. Even if they wanted to back out at that point, where were they gonna get rid of the guns (guns, that mind you, would've been illegal for them to posses and were illegally modified)?

They probably could of dismantled them and hid them in the forest

They'd have to bury them then, because otherwise those guns would still be accessible and would have their fingerprints on em.