Brooks Brown's personal facebook page

He might be feel alright with his coscience, ignoring it all and leaving it all behind as going on with it would fuel the drama

Brooks is good people and I've known and followed him a long time. I really don't think it's him at all and again, he's had experience before with crazy Columbiners. (Brenda being their Queen, lol!)

MnM wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


Btw, does anyone know how to save youtube videos? I'd like to still be able to view all his stuff in case he deletes his yt account because he is pretty awesome and some of these videos look funny.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I have never had any problems with this service, and I only use the free version. I have been using it since 2009. One thing is, sometimes the files you download will automatically save themselves to the FLV format, so if you don't like using FLV player, or just want them in another format, you'll have to convert them to whatever format you'd prefer. You can convert them right through the youtube downloader itself.

more cockpics to more underaged girls.
I choose a bad time to start following the tag

I wonder if it's real. I seriously hope not for his sake. I can't help but think if it isn't, there are some demented people in this world.

It's kind of a lose/lose deal.

I saw one comment last night 'you get what you deserve..pedo' when he tweeted about a revolving door closing on him.

This morning he posted a comment "sadness begets sadness and anger begets anger'.

Two hours later and he's locked his Twitter.

He's officially on LOCK DOWN with every social network. I wonder if his dad (who follows him closely on Facebook) or bro is asking him what is going on. ack!

I do think he was set up and I feel really bad for him.

He's done a lot of good talking about the bullying that went on at Columbine and I'm sure a lot of people opposed to him will use that to destroy his ideas and work.

Whoever made that fucking blog seems to be taking a lot of glee in trying to wreck his life.

MnM wrote:

I do think he was set up and I feel really bad for him.

He's done a lot of good talking about the bullying that went on at Columbine and I'm sure a lot of people opposed to him will use that to destroy his ideas and work.

Whoever made that fucking blog seems to be taking a lot of glee in trying to wreck his life.

I agree as I mentioned in a previous post he has contributed a great deal to Columbine research over the years regardless of if anyone believes what he says or not and so have his family. I wasn't sure what to make of the whole Tumblr drama at first but I do believe he's been set up, it's getting so out of hand and random people are posting screen shots of their "private conversations" with Brooks and harassing him on his personal online pages. Someone with alot of time on their hands has thought this was a great way to harm Brooks. It wouldn't surprise me if it's another obsessed 'Mrs Reb' who feels like they are "doing it for Eric." Very little fails to shock me now when it comes to Columbine anymore unfortunately. I hope Brooks is taking some kind of action against whoever originally posted all this stuff.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Show your love and support for a great man and hit him up on youtube ya'll! He needs good advice and support in his time of need.

"Lol where has her age been proven.. also who am i going to report it to ? there are 10000s of victims with heart wrenching cases way more important than a girl “manipulating” a pedophile and “posting his nudes without his consent” online. only like 3% of rapists spend a day in jail. cyber crimes are also incredibly hard to process and it would be a super messy expensive trial since alice lives in another fucking country. they’re not gonna spend half a million extraditing someone unless it’s for a serious thing like murder. it has been reported and nothing came of it so obviously the next best thing to do is warn his future victims? keep defending a pedophile and blaming alice rofl"

How very fucking convenient.

"Warn his future victims"
Yes by bitching on a blog.

Who does she think she is? Sailor Moon the paladin of justice?

"maybe in a couple weeks idk( on deleting the blog)"

Which means the blogger will keep posting until he/she gets bored.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

An eye bleach topic for the men. (though I know all you ladies must be happy, lol!)

Laeda wrote:

more cockpics to more underaged girls.
I choose a bad time to start following the tag

LOL i really shouldn't laugh but people are posting various different images that have apparently been sent to other girls and encouraging other Tumblr users to compare them to the original picture as they clearly all belong to the same person I'm not even looking anymore lol

There's actually a surmisable amount of evidence that suggests this is real.

1. The shirt in the video matches the shirt in his picture he sent her. (What are the chances of that?)
2. The voice in the video is similar.
3. His mannerisms are similar to what we know of him.
4. Has intricate knowledge of E&D which sounds legitimate.
5. He's locked down all social media.


If this was a fake, it was a very elaborate one. To generate that kind of material would take nothing less than a stalker with hours of research.

Also, the facebook pictures seem completely legitimate.

"If this was a fake, it was a very elaborate one. To generate that kind of material would take nothing less than a stalker with hours of research."

It is still possible it is not him. Greater hoaxes have been perpetrated throughout history as Brenda Parker could explain.

MarmaladeSkies wrote:

There's actually a surmisable amount of evidence that suggests this is real.

1. The shirt in the video matches the shirt in his picture he sent her. (What are the chances of that?)
2. The voice in the video is similar.
3. His mannerisms are similar to what we know of him.
4. Has intricate knowledge of E&D which sounds legitimate.
5. He's locked down all social media.


If this was a fake, it was a very elaborate one. To generate that kind of material would take nothing less than a stalker with hours of research.

Also, the facebook pictures seem completely legitimate.

I agree somewhat. However, the shirt is not the same. It's similiar but not the same thing. If the shirt was a match, it'd be a slam dunk because those styles of shirts are unique looking. It's possible, however, that he wears a lot of unique shirts - one in the vid and one in the photo.

The E & D stuff isn't really that intricate. I think anyone could make up that stuff having read his book and other Columbine books. Stuff like 'snowflake' - though, damn, that's cute if true. Otoh, disgusting all the same because it would mean it really is Brooks. eh.. How the boys acted drunk is pretty easy for anyone to surmise based on the information we already know about there personalities. Now, if we had someone that got inside CHS and scraped the paint off the sound room wall to reveal any graffiti that would be better verifiable proof. Oh, no, I am not suggesting that anyone do that in the least.

Everything else you mention - yes. He has a very distinctive voice and the video for me, kinda hit a nail in the coffin. The abrupt lock down on social media is interesting..but then again, I think to save his public persona and high profile career associated with Cameron, of course he'd do that regardless of it being him or not. Damage control. I am surprised he left his Twitter open for a while and then suddenly realized 'it' was following him everywhere. Ironically, it's definitely become cyber bullying and if it's not really him, it's also slander.

It's a major lose/lose for Brooks Brown whether it's him or not. This type of internet witch hunt could really push him into isolation. People have always looked to him for being so open and honest. It's disturbing and "sad" (to quote Brooks) whether it's truly him or not.

I said it before but he should speak out.

If he hides out like John Kerry did from the Swiftboaters then people will react to him like he's John Kerry, "oh he has something to hide so he must have done it."


In the worst-case scenario, whether true or not, if this drives him to isolation then he should move to Europe. A lot of places there have lower age consents (thanks for teaching me that Jersey Shore and people there wouldn't be as anxious to witch-hunt him like they are in America.

MnM wrote:

I said it before but he should speak out.

If he hides out like John Kerry did from the Swiftboaters then people will react to him like he's John Kerry, "oh he has something to hide so he must have done it."


In the worst-case scenario, whether true or not, if this drives him to isolation then he should move to Europe. A lot of places there have lower age consents (thanks for teaching me that Jersey Shore and people there wouldn't be as anxious to witch-hunt him like they are in America.

True. Though, it's a delicate situation. If he speaks out he'll draw attention to it. People will actively search the web and look for what transpired. He just got his new career in SoCal. A bit risky.

LOL Well, he did allude he was planning to move out of the country anyway. Hong Kong I believe. Americans can be the worst witch hunters. Guess it's the puritanical roots.

If framed, he could change his name too.



I've spoken to people from Hong Kong before. There's a lot of trouble with mainland China dumping in uneducated, blindly loyalist peasants there to dilute the trouble-making HKers.

It's paradise for a token rich, but hell for others. I honestly would not recommend HK to him unless it's to earn lots of money over a short period.

I hope he didn't do it but if he did-

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Damn. 16's the lowest age of consent in America. Just one year age difference and he could cry "no pedo". 15's right where the crossing point is.

Apparently the authorities have been contacted. We'll see. It's all over tumblr, and I saw this gem of a quote while on there.

"All we ever wanted was the basement tapes and all we got was a 45 second video of Brooks Brown masturbating."

MarmaladeSkies wrote:

Apparently the authorities have been contacted. We'll see.

How do you know that?

Fuuuuuuuuuuuck!

I hope he ain't guilty but if he is, he better bulk up and train like crazy for prison.


If he is guilty....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


ONLY because it's a first-time offense, and because he didn't do anything physical, I'd probably say psychological counseling and community service. Prison just makes anyone way more fucked-up than before and it's not going to help him.



I hope he ain't guilty and, at the very least, maybe a trial could prove his innocence at least, the one good thing that could come out of it.

Someone on tumblr said that, aparently giving all the info they had about this girl and the chat screenshots and links.

And the 'poor victim' is reclutant to the idea, shouldn't she be alright with her 'cyber abuser' getting a lesson?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Which of these is more accurate? If the top one is then what Brooks did would be legal in at least 5 states. (note that I'd approve of such behavior if he did do it) Plus I know wikipedia does have a lot of bogus info in it sometimes.

This strikes me as a joke/hoax/mean prank that has home waaaaaay too far.
You'd have a hard time convincing me that Brooks, who works in the IT field, was stupid enough to do anything like this over the net. He's just not that dumb. And it doesn't even make sense. If he were to do something illegal over the net, he certainly wouldn't do it for a chance to pop an underaged cherry, of a weird Columbiner yet.
What, he won't continue to talk about Dylan and Eric for money but he'd do it for sex? For real? Come on.
There are a million beautiful girls in the world. Whoever the fuck "Alice" is, she can't be that pretty.

I think that ultimately whether Brooks is innocent or not no longer matters as much as one would like to think. Look at this thread. Already a gossip pit debating did he or didn't he, and the scenario has been pictured and taljed about even by those who reject it.
Tumblr. Twitter. Facebook. All platforms for expression to which this has already bled.
Just as Snowflake will live on in Fanon, so Brooks will live on as guilty. I wish him a much happier life overseas. I really can't see him ever being happy here.

BurnIt wrote:

I wish him a much happier life overseas. I really can't see him ever being happy here.

He's moving overseas? Didn't he just get a job working for James Cameron?

Brooks is a hero for all he's done. It'll be a damn shame if this fake bullshit about him becomes all people associate with him.

MnM wrote:

Fuuuuuuuuuuuck!

I hope he ain't guilty but if he is, he better bulk up and train like crazy for prison.


If he is guilty....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


ONLY because it's a first-time offense, and because he didn't do anything physical, I'd probably say psychological counseling and community service. Prison just makes anyone way more fucked-up than before and it's not going to help him.



I hope he ain't guilty and, at the very least, maybe a trial could prove his innocence at least, the one good thing that could come out of it.

It could be worse. He could be added to the sex offender list and quite possibly loss his job. It is scary stuff if it is untrue.

MarmaladeSkies wrote:

Apparently the authorities have been contacted. We'll see. It's all over tumblr, and I saw this gem of a quote while on there.

"All we ever wanted was the basement tapes and all we got was a 45 second video of Brooks Brown masturbating."

One reason above all others I think this is NOT true...


I just remembered.... in an old interview he said he used to be invited to speak at schools (and I think get paid traveling and other expenses) against bullying but stopped because, "over time I noticed a pattern- the schools that needed me the most, and had problems, would refuse to bring me in. The better schools, without problems, were more comfortable having me speak."


Okay. So some people think Brooks is this big, scary pedophile anxious to chase after some young tail...

So WHY would he give up this kind of job if he was? That'd be like a pedophile giving up being a priest or a Scout Leader!

Pedophiles don't run from or avoid opportunities to hang around children, they jump on the opportunities like crazy. It'd be like the equivalent of a fried-chicken fanatic turning down being PAID to eat KFC! I mean, I try to eat healthier these days to be in shape but I wouldn't turn down good free money to eat KFC.


So Brooks "the pedophile" has the opportunity to get PAID to hang around Jr. High and High school girls and have them oohh and aww over his every word and tell him how wonderful he is and give an excuse to hang out with them in person, maybe exchange contact info, and just says, "fuck it?"

HELL NO. Does NOT sound like what a pedophile would do at all in his situation!



Therefore, he sure as fuck ain't one!

But apparently we're expected to believe that this same internet-savy cat would be dumb enough to start whipping it out with some complete stranger while using identifiable info.

Yeah...

And somebody needs to tumblr/tweet this fucking message to those asshole fakers framing him and the hater believers!


Good night!

Whether it is true or entirely a scheme by bored fools, I sincerely do not grasp why the primary blog exposing the videos does so, and still shrieks that they're doing it to spread awareness to help protect underage girls. I'll tell you this, if information like this was shared with me for whatever reason, and my concern was protecting underage children, the last thing I'd do is post explicit videos of the perpetrator's genitalia. That is the whole supposed point of this calling out of Brooks, according to that blog. They supposedly fear that he'd send pictures and videos of his penis to these children if they ever talked to him privately.....so, how is posting these exact explicit and damaging images and videos right in the tag of a site all of these children frequent "helping" to "protect" them?

tfsa47090 wrote:

Whether it is true or entirely a scheme by bored fools, I sincerely do not grasp why the primary blog exposing the videos does so, and still shrieks that they're doing it to spread awareness to help protect underage girls. I'll tell you this, if information like this was shared with me for whatever reason, and my concern was protecting underage children, the last thing I'd do is post explicit videos of the perpetrator's genitalia. That is the whole supposed point of this calling out of Brooks, according to that blog. They supposedly fear that he'd send pictures and videos of his penis to these children if they ever talked to him privately.....so, how is posting these exact explicit and damaging images and videos right in the tag of a site all of these children frequent "helping" to "protect" them?

That's a good question, because we all know the majority of Tumblr Columbiners are teenagers. Do you believe this whole thing or do you think it's just a rumor?

Jenn wrote:

tfsa47090 wrote:

Whether it is true or entirely a scheme by bored fools, I sincerely do not grasp why the primary blog exposing the videos does so, and still shrieks that they're doing it to spread awareness to help protect underage girls. I'll tell you this, if information like this was shared with me for whatever reason, and my concern was protecting underage children, the last thing I'd do is post explicit videos of the perpetrator's genitalia. That is the whole supposed point of this calling out of Brooks, according to that blog. They supposedly fear that he'd send pictures and videos of his penis to these children if they ever talked to him privately.....so, how is posting these exact explicit and damaging images and videos right in the tag of a site all of these children frequent "helping" to "protect" them?

That's a good question, because we all know the majority of Tumblr Columbiners are teenagers. Do you believe this whole thing or do you think it's just a rumor?

I honestly don't know. The voice thing threw me off, that's for sure. It is so hard to say. Tumblr is a cesspool. It is just too lax with rules and essentially unrestricted. I've been on there and have seen my own share of demented trouble with mentally unhinged individuals, all of whom were actually grown adults, so, regarding that, I would not remotely put it past someone to do something this elaborate and horrid purely out of spite. Honestly.

The person who is the supposed actual victim has posted some seriously bizarre photoshops of them inside the cafeteria with Eric and Dylan, among others. I have to say when I saw them last year I laughed because it was so insane, but I can see someone getting pissed off that Brooks, or someone pretending to be him, stopped giving information, or showed irritation at constantly being asked to do so, and them attacking him like this. I do notice in all of those screen shots of the alleged conversations that he (the real Brooks or not) does still say some raunchy things, but does start to back away once they indicate that they're supposedly 15. It makes me wonder if they said they were underage when Brooks made it clear that they were tired of being asked about Dylan and Eric, in order to have some leverage over him. Like, maybe they were worried about all of the previous sexually explicit conversation that they'd written themselves being exposed, and wanted to make sure they had a way to make him (real or impostor) look bad, and make themselves look like a victim.

Some of these people, of all ages, spend days and nights on that site stalking one another and wreaking pathetic havoc whenever they can entirely for their own amusement. I just have to say that it is highly probable that someone did this just to be a scumbag, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's innocent. Anything could have set them off.

What if there are more parts of the conversations that we don't have access to? What if they still randomly chatted, and Brooks (real or impostor) told them they were entirely through with maintaining contact with them, let alone answering Dylan and Eric questions? What if she said "oh, I was just testing you, I really am 18". And he just decided it was too insane for him and his mental health.

They say this all happened during October (correct me if I'm wrong). Anything is possible, but how are you divorced a month later? If it is Brooks, that divorce was probably already coming, and he started talking to this chick in a confused rebound way. If that is the case, that still doesn't make it acceptable to be so explicit with a minor by any means, but I think even if he is guilty, the person doing this has a vendetta, and it has to do with covering her own ass and getting back at him. Although I don't know for certain, of course, it just comes off that they are entirely lying about their age.

I am not a predatory "apologist" by any means. If he did do this, it is just utterly disturbing. But, right now, something is just "off" about it.

tfsa47090 wrote:

Jenn wrote:

tfsa47090 wrote:

Whether it is true or entirely a scheme by bored fools, I sincerely do not grasp why the primary blog exposing the videos does so, and still shrieks that they're doing it to spread awareness to help protect underage girls. I'll tell you this, if information like this was shared with me for whatever reason, and my concern was protecting underage children, the last thing I'd do is post explicit videos of the perpetrator's genitalia. That is the whole supposed point of this calling out of Brooks, according to that blog. They supposedly fear that he'd send pictures and videos of his penis to these children if they ever talked to him privately.....so, how is posting these exact explicit and damaging images and videos right in the tag of a site all of these children frequent "helping" to "protect" them?

That's a good question, because we all know the majority of Tumblr Columbiners are teenagers. Do you believe this whole thing or do you think it's just a rumor?

I honestly don't know. The voice thing threw me off, that's for sure. It is so hard to say. Tumblr is a cesspool. It is just too lax with rules and essentially unrestricted. I've been on there and have seen my own share of demented trouble with mentally unhinged individuals, all of whom were actually grown adults, so, regarding that, I would not remotely put it past someone to do something this elaborate and horrid purely out of spite. Honestly.

The person who is the supposed actual victim has posted some seriously bizarre photoshops of them inside the cafeteria with Eric and Dylan, among others. I have to say when I saw them last year I laughed because it was so insane, but I can see someone getting pissed off that Brooks, or someone pretending to be him, stopped giving information, or showed irritation at constantly being asked to do so, and them attacking him like this. I do notice in all of those screen shots of the alleged conversations that he (the real Brooks or not) does still say some raunchy things, but does start to back away once they indicate that they're supposedly 15. It makes me wonder if they said they were underage when Brooks made it clear that they were tired of being asked about Dylan and Eric, in order to have some leverage over him. Like, maybe they were worried about all of the previous sexually explicit conversation that they'd written themselves being exposed, and wanted to make sure they had a way to make him (real or impostor) look bad, and make themselves look like a victim.

Some of these people, of all ages, spend days and nights on that site stalking one another and wreaking pathetic havoc whenever they can entirely for their own amusement. I just have to say that it is highly probable that someone did this just to be a scumbag, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's innocent. Anything could have set them off.

What if there are more parts of the conversations that we don't have access to? What if they still randomly chatted, and Brooks (real or impostor) told them they were entirely through with maintaining contact with them, let alone answering Dylan and Eric questions? What if she said "oh, I was just testing you, I really am 18". And he just decided it was too insane for him and his mental health.

They say this all happened during October (correct me if I'm wrong). Anything is possible, but how are you divorced a month later? If it is Brooks, that divorce was probably already coming, and he started talking to this chick in a confused rebound way. If that is the case, that still doesn't make it acceptable to be so explicit with a minor by any means, but I think even if he is guilty, the person doing this has a vendetta, and it has to do with covering her own ass and getting back at him. Although I don't know for certain, of course, it just comes off that they are entirely lying about their age.

I am not a predatory "apologist" by any means. If he did do this, it is just utterly disturbing. But, right now, something is just "off" about it.

It happened in October/November and "Brooks", I will use quotations, cuz we don't know if it is actually him or not. But "Brooks" said that he was married and that he and his wife were excited and nervous to be moving to LA. So if a divorce was already pending, why would they move to LA together? Something had to have happened for him to suddenly get divorced. Does anyone know when his divorce took place?

There has to be some of the conversation missing because didn't someone say that this "Alice" blackmailed him and told him either he was to tell his wife, or she'd tell her? So, where is this part of the conversation where she blackmailed him?

I once sent Brooks a PM on Reddit asking him a question about Dylan and he told me how he believed that 'humans were very complex' and he said the exact same thing in those chat logs. Once I saw that I was pretty much convinced it was him, along with all the other stuff. And there is a photo of his face. How would this person have gotten this photo, unless Brooks sent it to them? And it isn't like it is a photo of him out at a book signing or something. It is of him sitting in his house. A very personal picture.

And also, why is he deleting all social media? If this was you and someone was accusing you of this, wouldn't you be doing anything possible to clear your name? Making a statement or something? He is just running and hiding. I don't know what to think about the whole thing. I am really beginning to think he did it though. I think he did it more than I don't think he did.

Jenn wrote:

tfsa47090 wrote:

Jenn wrote:

tfsa47090 wrote:

Whether it is true or entirely a scheme by bored fools, I sincerely do not grasp why the primary blog exposing the videos does so, and still shrieks that they're doing it to spread awareness to help protect underage girls. I'll tell you this, if information like this was shared with me for whatever reason, and my concern was protecting underage children, the last thing I'd do is post explicit videos of the perpetrator's genitalia. That is the whole supposed point of this calling out of Brooks, according to that blog. They supposedly fear that he'd send pictures and videos of his penis to these children if they ever talked to him privately.....so, how is posting these exact explicit and damaging images and videos right in the tag of a site all of these children frequent "helping" to "protect" them?

That's a good question, because we all know the majority of Tumblr Columbiners are teenagers. Do you believe this whole thing or do you think it's just a rumor?

I honestly don't know. The voice thing threw me off, that's for sure. It is so hard to say. Tumblr is a cesspool. It is just too lax with rules and essentially unrestricted. I've been on there and have seen my own share of demented trouble with mentally unhinged individuals, all of whom were actually grown adults, so, regarding that, I would not remotely put it past someone to do something this elaborate and horrid purely out of spite. Honestly.

The person who is the supposed actual victim has posted some seriously bizarre photoshops of them inside the cafeteria with Eric and Dylan, among others. I have to say when I saw them last year I laughed because it was so insane, but I can see someone getting pissed off that Brooks, or someone pretending to be him, stopped giving information, or showed irritation at constantly being asked to do so, and them attacking him like this. I do notice in all of those screen shots of the alleged conversations that he (the real Brooks or not) does still say some raunchy things, but does start to back away once they indicate that they're supposedly 15. It makes me wonder if they said they were underage when Brooks made it clear that they were tired of being asked about Dylan and Eric, in order to have some leverage over him. Like, maybe they were worried about all of the previous sexually explicit conversation that they'd written themselves being exposed, and wanted to make sure they had a way to make him (real or impostor) look bad, and make themselves look like a victim.

Some of these people, of all ages, spend days and nights on that site stalking one another and wreaking pathetic havoc whenever they can entirely for their own amusement. I just have to say that it is highly probable that someone did this just to be a scumbag, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's innocent. Anything could have set them off.

What if there are more parts of the conversations that we don't have access to? What if they still randomly chatted, and Brooks (real or impostor) told them they were entirely through with maintaining contact with them, let alone answering Dylan and Eric questions? What if she said "oh, I was just testing you, I really am 18". And he just decided it was too insane for him and his mental health.

They say this all happened during October (correct me if I'm wrong). Anything is possible, but how are you divorced a month later? If it is Brooks, that divorce was probably already coming, and he started talking to this chick in a confused rebound way. If that is the case, that still doesn't make it acceptable to be so explicit with a minor by any means, but I think even if he is guilty, the person doing this has a vendetta, and it has to do with covering her own ass and getting back at him. Although I don't know for certain, of course, it just comes off that they are entirely lying about their age.

I am not a predatory "apologist" by any means. If he did do this, it is just utterly disturbing. But, right now, something is just "off" about it.

It happened in October/November and "Brooks", I will use quotations, cuz we don't know if it is actually him or not. But "Brooks" said that he was married and that he and his wife were excited and nervous to be moving to LA. So if a divorce was already pending, why would they move to LA together? Something had to have happened for him to suddenly get divorced. Does anyone know when his divorce took place?

There has to be some of the conversation missing because didn't someone say that this "Alice" blackmailed him and told him either he was to tell his wife, or she'd tell her? So, where is this part of the conversation where she blackmailed him?

I once sent Brooks a PM on Reddit asking him a question about Dylan and he told me how he believed that 'humans were very complex' and he said the exact same thing in those chat logs. Once I saw that I was pretty much convinced it was him, along with all the other stuff. And there is a photo of his face. How would this person have gotten this photo, unless Brooks sent it to them? And it isn't like it is a photo of him out at a book signing or something. It is of him sitting in his house. A very personal picture.

And also, why is he deleting all social media? If this was you and someone was accusing you of this, wouldn't you be doing anything possible to clear your name? Making a statement or something? He is just running and hiding. I don't know what to think about the whole thing. I am really beginning to think he did it though. I think he did it more than I don't think he did.

That is a good point about the photo in his home. I didn't think about that. But, I do know that people had access to his information and some photos when he would add them or let them subscribe to him on facebook. I did not subscribe to him ever, or anything like that, but I was told. So, that may be where she got it, but it doesn't mean he didn't send it to her privately himself.

For the most part, I do think I'd make some kind of a statement if all of this was going on against me; something that would be entirely open to the public. However, I would still hide, delete, or alter the urls (or whatever) to any social media I was active on. Again, the big thing is, I WOULD post a statement even though I'd tighten up my privacy everywhere else. That does not look good, but, then again, he could think, or someone around him could have suggested, that saying something implies guilt, and maybe that's why he's doing it.

I still do see the deletions and making everything private as quite suspect behavior, myself, but due to the somewhat high profile nature of his present profession, he really may have been advised to stay silent.

I did read that he was divorced in November. Maybe they were still trying to give it a shot. Moving somewhere new might have made things better, but, if these conversations actually happened with this female, any issues they had previously were made worse and maybe they decided to get a divorce at that point. Maybe he'd been unfaithful before, too. Who knows...

Like almost anything, I do not believe that all of the conversation has been shared. I also think some of it is being hidden. That obviously leads to "why?". She is the one exposing him for what she is making out to be very valid and serious reasons, what else is there to hide? If those videos and photos are indeed him, I mean, again, what in the world is there left to hide?. That's another part of this that is just "off" to me.

The notion that he would make a statement if he was truly innocent is such a false one. Maybe he thinks that an Internet hoax can only go so far and that an official statement would fan the flames.We all remember that old chestnut right; Less said soonest mended.
Or perhaps a official response would just leave his words twisted.
Maybe he feels making a statement would give credence to the accusations.
Maybe his doesn't want to dance like their puppet and do what they want him to do (make a statement)

What do we tell people about bullying? Ignore them and they will get bored and go find someone else to bother. Brooks seems to me like he's ignoring them whilst going about his daily business. I'm sure the people on Twitter, FB and possibly even Tumblr that he wanted to remain in contact with have been given his new social media account information. He may simply be walking away from those accounts the same way I walked away from my hotmail account when the spam became overwhelming.

I read about the blackmailing too.. She basically said she was "the reason for his divorce"
I don't know how that's supposedly happened but she someows forced him to tell his wife about her.. But these conversations aren't there or at least I didn't see them
If you say he was divorced in October then it doesn't fit
They started chatting in October and he said of being married, but I think I read that he got "blackmailed" around February so for this version he should have divorced then

Someone else noticed about the wedding ring missing in the masturbationvideos while he had it in photos from the E3 that took place aroud the same time (and still, he said he was still married)

Laeda wrote:

Someone else noticed about the wedding ring missing in the masturbationvideos while he had it in photos from the E3 that took place aroud the same time (and still, he said he was still married)

Idk. Probably because guys that are in the midst of doing something sexually illicit tend to take off their wedding ring so it won't be a distraction to the girl?

BurnIt wrote:

The notion that he would make a statement if he was truly innocent is such a false one. Maybe he thinks that an Internet hoax can only go so far and that an official statement would fan the flames.We all remember that old chestnut right; Less said soonest mended.
Or perhaps a official response would just leave his words twisted.
Maybe he feels making a statement would give credence to the accusations.
Maybe his doesn't want to dance like their puppet and do what they want him to do (make a statement)

What do we tell people about bullying? Ignore them and they will get bored and go find someone else to bother. Brooks seems to me like he's ignoring them whilst going about his daily business. I'm sure the people on Twitter, FB and possibly even Tumblr that he wanted to remain in contact with have been given his new social media account information. He may simply be walking away from those accounts the same way I walked away from my hotmail account when the spam became overwhelming.

Agreed. I think this is his MO. Don't say anything, disappear, it will all blow over in time. Though, this public rep that he has now acquired could rear it's ugly head at any time in the future. ;)

InFiNiNcEX5 wrote:

Laeda wrote:

Someone else noticed about the wedding ring missing in the masturbationvideos while he had it in photos from the E3 that took place aroud the same time (and still, he said he was still married)

Idk. Probably because guys that are in the midst of doing something sexually illicit tend to take off their wedding ring so it won't be a distraction to the girl?

No idea, she knew he was married anyway and she was 'fine with it' so could have kept it
I see your point though, "I'm doing something with someone else so I better act like I don't have a family despite we both know the truth" or something like that as it would look "less wrong".
But it could also mean that in the video is some other random unmarried man

tfsa47090 wrote:

Whether it is true or entirely a scheme by bored fools, I sincerely do not grasp why the primary blog exposing the videos does so, and still shrieks that they're doing it to spread awareness to help protect underage girls. I'll tell you this, if information like this was shared with me for whatever reason, and my concern was protecting underage children, the last thing I'd do is post explicit videos of the perpetrator's genitalia. That is the whole supposed point of this calling out of Brooks, according to that blog. They supposedly fear that he'd send pictures and videos of his penis to these children if they ever talked to him privately.....so, how is posting these exact explicit and damaging images and videos right in the tag of a site all of these children frequent "helping" to "protect" them?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Yeah, that's pretty messed-up logic the guy is employing....

"I once sent Brooks a PM on Reddit asking him a question about Dylan and he told me how he believed that 'humans were very complex' and he said the exact same thing in those chat logs."

If you study someone long enough it's easy to copy their mannerisms and way of speaking.

Anyway, given the above post, I don't think the primary motive of the person accusing him of being a pedo is to "help out" little girls or else, why would he be encouraging countless thousands of teenagers to check out some dick pics and masturbation videos?

As for those things.... well, this IS the internet. If you search long enough you can find nearly kind of freaky porn out there, or find someone/something that looks vaguely like somebody else. And anyone posting all that shit for thousands of little girls to see is definitely a perv with too much time on their hands.

THANK YOU JESUS, THE FUCKING TUMBLR IS -FINALLY- DOWN.

Damage has already been done to an innocent man's reputation though.









"Ok so it’s been confirmed that video wasent him that picture came from a photo generator website , I’m still waiting on answers for those chat things though but tbh anyone can make one of those so I wouldn’t be to quick to process all of this if I were you guys"

I hope this is true!  Where's the proof this statement is true though so that people can finally leave Brooks alone? (maybe that's why the person deleted their blog finally)

Finally!
They either got tired of bitching or they've shitted in their own pants reading police has been alerted.
Little young Alice is all laughs and fun about it, doesn't seem so sexually harrassed.

Huh. Wouldja look at that? Funny how just the word Cops will just light a fire up a girl's ass.