[[

Possibly the lamest excuse ever for his actions. His partner should've been held accountable for all the deaths.

emanresu wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This article states:

"Stephen Paddock had a troubled childhood, with a bank robber for a father, who regularly beat him,"

????? This is the first time i'm hearing this??? Does anyone have further information on this?

This would be the first time I've heard this too. If it's true, it adds some more insight into Paddock, but only a little.

Ivan wrote:

His partner should've been held accountable for all the deaths.

What are you even talking about?

QuestionMark wrote:

Ivan wrote:

His partner should've been held accountable for all the deaths.

What are you even talking about?

The Filipino woman he was dating that supposedly had "no idea" what he was doing? I know you love questioning everything I post but do try to keep up.

Ivan wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

Ivan wrote:

His partner should've been held accountable for all the deaths.

What are you even talking about?

The Filipino woman he was dating that supposedly had "no idea" what he was doing?

If you can present any evidence - not a gut feeling, hard evidence - that she knew Paddock's intentions then I'd love to hear it (and I'm sure so would the LVPD), otherwise this claim is totally baseless.

Ivan wrote:

I know you love questioning everything I post

This is untrue, I only reply to you (or anyone else for that matter) when I feel there's something worth saying. I haven't bothered responding to the vast majority of things you've posted since returning and I have no desire to oppose you every time you speak.

If you honestly feel I'm unjustly targeting you, you can always block me.

QuestionMark wrote:

Ivan wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

Ivan wrote:

His partner should've been held accountable for all the deaths.

What are you even talking about?

The Filipino woman he was dating that supposedly had "no idea" what he was doing?

If you can present any evidence - not a gut feeling, hard evidence - that she knew Paddock's intentions then I'd love to hear it (and I'm sure so would the LVPD), otherwise this claim is totally baseless.

Seems like a bit of a coincidence that a month before the attacks she moved away and purchased a house with his money.

On top of that she lived with him and knew he was building a collection of firearms. If she isn't held accountable for that knowledge, which can almost be argued is excessory before the fact, then I don't believe it's justice. All that time and she knew nothing? I don't buy it.

Ivan wrote:

Seems like a bit of a coincidence that a month before the attacks she moved away and purchased a house with his money.

But that doesn't mean she knew what he was doing. Furthermore she went right back to the United States voluntarily, so if she was trying to evade the authorities she did a poor job of it.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
"Danley, who was overseas for more than two weeks, said she was initially pleased when Paddock wired her money in the Philippines to buy a house for her family. But she later feared it was a way to break up with her."

Ivan wrote:

On top of that she lived with him and knew he was building a collection of firearms.

He had been a gun collector for 35 years. (See page 121).
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

QuestionMark wrote:

Ivan wrote:

Seems like a bit of a coincidence that a month before the attacks she moved away and purchased a house with his money.

But that doesn't mean she knew what he was doing. Furthermore she went right back to the United States voluntarily, so if she was trying to evade the authorities she did a poor job of it.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
"Danley, who was overseas for more than two weeks, said she was initially pleased when Paddock wired her money in the Philippines to buy a house for her family. But she later feared it was a way to break up with her."

Ivan wrote:

On top of that she lived with him and knew he was building a collection of firearms.

He had been a gun collector for 35 years. (See page 121).
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

1) She obviously knew he wasn't going to be around much longer if she just up-and-moved before the attacks occurred.

2) He bought 55 firearms in a one year period.. but yeah. That's not suspicious because he had collected guns for 35 years. Alright.

She had to have known something. It's obvious.