Campo Delgado; Baruch Goldstein, and Tian Mingjian

What are your thoughts on these three shooters. I believe, considering parallels between them, Baruch Goldstein could be said to be the most proficient (excluding that he got beaten to death whereas the others were just shot once and died). I bring them up, because all three of them were in the same general time period, in three different countries, from three different cultural and ancestry backgrounds, and all killed the same amount. They are good ones to compare as a subset for subconscious ethnic self-perception, as well as just ones that had good kill totals, and none of them were particularly well-planned in it either. They were all—actual grown men, not pissed teenagers—that did quite deadly massacres quite impulsively. At least in the genuine preparation, and not the mental planning beforehand. None of them fit the modern cultural norms either. In regards to murderer stereotype, or truth. They even all were in the military at some point. Very underrated mass murderers in my opinion. Fun cases.

But why are you making these parallels? What represents?

Sociokiller wrote:

But why are you making these parallels? What represents?

Please explain yourself, [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. You are the scholar… I just drew a few of many parallels and wanted to mention them.

DelusionalEritrean wrote:

Sociokiller wrote:

But why are you making these parallels? What represents?

Please explain yourself, [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. You are the scholar… I just drew a few of many parallels and wanted to mention them.

Ah, but do you think there is a cosmic correspondence between them as occurred in Elliot's case?

Well, it could be. However, my study is focused on signs warning people of birth. then I can see if there is something like that with them.

Soldier that turns a gun against civilians is not a "rogue" but a person who found his mind's orders in higher priority than a cocky officer's ones.