What Makes A School Threat Or Shooting Terrorism?

Just wondering since so many of these dumbasses keep getting arrested for "terrorism" despite it honestly being an angsty boy angry at society thing.

Nothing. It's a bogus charge. What terrorist motives Ethan Crumbley express? It works because there is no true definition, and it's hard to disprove. It's standard procedure to charge as many significant crimes as possible. The terrorism charge is particularly dangerous because it fucks your sentencing terms.

they don't have a proper charge for such an act, so they just call it terrorism.

but, when you look at it from a basic view, and when i mean basic, i mean extremely basic, like explaining to a 5 year old basic; a shooting could be considered terrorism because if you were to walk around with a gun blasting people down, that's technically terrorising the people around you.

suzuhiro that's stupid IMO cause terrorism is political/religious but I guess some people are just fucking dumb

BlackAndWhiteKittenz wrote:

suzuhiro that's stupid IMO cause terrorism is political/religious but I guess some people are just fucking dumb

you are 100% correct. not even just in your opinion, terrorism is literally defined as that.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Depends, Terrorism is to push some type of ideology by commiting shootings, bombings, stabbings. I would say the white supremacists shooters are technically terrorists but the columbine copycats are not since they aren't pushing any ideology other then being nihilistic egotists.

It means nothing, it's just some stupid label put onto people's actions so lawyers can profit and capital can keep moving around.