Brian Rohrbough

I can't decide if he was overly angry, what do you guys think?

I support him. He had, still does rather, the right to be angry. His son was left for dead on the pavement with aerial shots over him, and the cops lied about the reason they can't take Danny's clothes back, and he was given mixed answers over who took his son's life. However, my support for him stops at the line where the whole christian propaganda begins.
I can't help but stand by him since he did a part helping randy hound jefferson county over evidence and case handling corruption etc. I think he's alright, he had alot to say and he has the right to. If the way he handled things the years after 4/20 makes him overly angry then randy and judy brown are practically the first columbine groupies. the browns weren't "angry", judy was definitely more vocal but it can't be helped that the boy that she made complains about literally shot up a school with the guy who was childhood friends with their son.

The Browns, even Brooks to an extent, male me mad, they seem very attention seeking, like they're always trying to get in in everybody else's business to make themselves more critical/important, even when Brooks was barely involved. Even John Savage said he makes stuff up.

speaking of Brian this is a very good listen/episode of the radio show he was featured on couple years back [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Credits to the evidences section for bringing this radio show to light.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] sure, they are, however, the one time they pried into other's business, they should have been listened to, cause Columbine happened. Of course the crime itself is separate from their speculations because harris and klebold made their own decision to commit the crime, but it might have been prevented if judy's complaints had a follow up. in the end jeffco had a pre-existing search warrant that could be utilised following 4/20 ironically thanks to the complaints the browns made towards eric. Most of the evidences we could even look @ today is thanks to randy's constant hounding.

I think anyone whose child was murdered in such a senseless act can be as GD angry as he or she wants to be.

Though I don't think all that anger is necessarily healthy, I would have hoped by now that he would have reached what some therapists term "post-traumatic growth" by now.

I cannot blame him for being angry and bitter on a human level.I can't judge him for that.However he is a devoted Christian and says he will never forgive E &D because under the scriptures he doesn't have to because they were unrepentant.The scriptures don't say that at all.They just command you to forgive.That makes no sense to me.

NotYourRobot wrote:

I can't decide if he was overly angry, what do you guys think?

I may disagree with him, but his level of anger is entirely appropriate, given what happened.

I just found out that he was Alan Keyes' vice presidential pick for some fringe party back in 2008. Weird.