You're welcome.
I included the redacted photo as a joke. The redacted image is containing part of the shooters clothing. The reason for redaction is incomprehensible. This is what the CSP says regarding why the photograph was redacted:
"Personnel/medical/similar files, invasion of personal privacy"
"Right to privacy (US Const. Amend. 14) and/or Victim Rights (CT Const. Art. 1 Sec 8b)"
What is this suppose to mean in this context?
They don't make sense. How does an image of Lanza's vest for example, violate the above?
Quotes are from the Redaction Index.
_________________
"I hate how I spend 99% of my time upset about culture, when life itself is the problem.
Culture just adds insult to injury." - By Smiggles on SBB forum.