Dr. Oz interviews Susan Klebold (2016-02-17)

Again, it is in SD. I am trying to cut out the commercials.

1: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
2: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
3: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
4: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
5: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
6: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
7: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Okeh, the first part is up.

The first three parts are up. Four more to go.

Thank you so much! Boy, you're fast.

Thank you!

Thank you!

carrie12 wrote:

Thank you so much! Boy, you're fast.

I recorded it to my computer as it was being broadcast. At the end of each segment, I stopped recording; at the beginning of the next segment, I started up again. That way, each segment is in its own clip and I don't have to waste time editing.

Thanks again Porter ....

The fourth part is taking a long time to process. Part 5 is already ready. But I'll hold off for a few more minutes.

Too bad all these interviewers basically ask the same questions.

C#major wrote:

Too bad all these interviewers basically ask the same questions.

Yeah.

But what do you expect?

"Susan, is your son rotting in Hell right now?"

"Where do you keep his ashes?"

"Did you ever push him to bathe more often?"

The whole thing has now uploaded, so I'll add the rest of the clips.

Those are not the kind of questions I'd favour. Yet these repetetive "How did you find out something was wrong"-questions, are getting dull.

C#major wrote:

Those are not the kind of questions I'd favour. Yet these repetetive "How did you find out something was wrong"-questions, are getting dull.

Well, yes.

But keep in mind that most folks aren't watching every single interview. She's doing the publicity rounds.

Yes I understand. I just find it a bit of a waste when all these questions are being recycled, especially when most of these are pretty much answered for in Sue's book. It's a unique possibilty wasted as I assume this will be the last appearance Sue will make.

Thanks for uploading though.

One thing I'd like to point out  that I think is very much worth mentioning is that Dr. Oz asked Sue " So I see from the book that you blame Eric Harris for leading Dylan into this?" And she said "I don't like to use the word blame. I think they were pulled towards each other like magnetic poles and they each fulfilled a need in the other."

 Which of course is not what she said at all in the book. But my main point is that Dr. Oz even picked up on the fact that she blames Eric in her book which is obviously why he phrased it that way. So others see it too and it is not just a few disgruntled Columbiners or whoever who made that observation at all.

PaintItBlack wrote:

One thing I'd like to point out  that I think is very much worth mentioning is that Dr. Oz asked Sue " So I see from the book that you blame Eric Harris for leading Dylan into this?" And she said "I don't like to use the word blame. I think they were pulled towards each other like magnetic poles and they each fulfilled a need in the other."

 Which of course is not what she said at all in the book. But my main point is that Dr. Oz even picked up on the fact that she blames Eric in her book which is obviously why he phrased it that way. So others see it too and it is not just a few disgruntled Columbiners or whoever who made that observation at all.

Sounds to me like she goes back and forth in what she thinks, or that she holds multiple possible explanations for how things were. What she wrote in the book may not have been the whole picture of what she thinks, because in writing a book, things have to be said a certain way--there's a set "acceptable format" going in books and memoirs, and the expectation that an author will squeeze all their ideas into a level of cohesion and linearity that some of those ideas can't naturally have. The expectation is a streamlined story leading to a neat set of conclusions, and this isn't one of those stories.

Cullen was on board for the book--if not him, then certainly the expectations, narrative and standards he set for What Columbine Was, so she had to refer back to it. So will everyone who writes another book about Columbine, tbh.