Redacted because it's just making people argue.

Redacted because it's just starting arguments.

Research for yourself. That's the whole point.

If you want to find something you will.

That's pretty interesting. I always assumed they killed about the same. I wouldn't be surprised if Dave Cullen used this fact to bolster his Eric Harris super-psychopath narrative.

It is interesting to think about Lisa K's statement which I often come back to. The whole "are you still with me?" if it was when they entered the library the first time it could have been Eric to Dylan and that is why Dylan shot and killed Kyle right away.

eric shot her after dylan fired 8 shots iirc

Dylan killed John Tomlin and Lauren Townsend. Eric only grazed John Tomlin and Eric only shot Lauren Townsend when she was already dead. Dylan could also possibly be the one that shot Dave Sanders. I am adding screenshots of the sheriff's report.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Eric killed 8 and Dylan killed 5.

By the way Dylan shot Corey depooter through the lung and neck. According to the autopsy two of the shots were actually one shot with a re-entry. so Eric shot him twice. According to Austin Eubanks witness statement Dylan shot Corey first so Dylan most likely delivered the kill shot.[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

This is what I'm talking about (that apparently goes missed even when directly stated) you have to look at the autopsy reports and analyze the actual details of the wounds to understand who killed whom...

Research for yourself at the source instead of just jumping in to provide proof that supports what you already believe. Don't take my word for it, look deeper for yourself...

EthanEmerson wrote:

The Sheriff's report is one of the summaries that does not match the autopsy report.

Dylan did not kill Lauren, he shot her after Eric (not the other way around). Even if he had shot her first - his shots were soft tissue injuries only.

This is what I'm talking about (that apparently goes missed even when directly stated) you have to look at the autopsy reports and analyze the actual details of the wounds to understand who killed whom...

Research for yourself at the source instead of just jumping in to provide proof that supports what you already believe. I did this for 19 years and I could not only rip Cullen's book to shreds, but I could rip 95% of what people believe to shreds... I don't have any interest in doing that, but all I can say is look deeper because when you can be open to looking deeper, you will be amazed at what you'll find... don't take my word for it, look deeper for yourself...

The El Paso report says that Eric killed Danny Rohrbough.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] you're right that was my typo
Dylan shot him in the leg after Eric already killed him

Whatever makes you feel better

It's not about feeling better it's about investigating to the source... to see what doesn't match.

See for yourself... trace everything back. Don't take my word for it.

Two of Dylan's bullets hit Lauren's large intestines, small intestines,, upper and middle lobes of the left lung, liver, left Hemidiaphragm, and broke her pelvis. That is besides the other 5 'soft tissue' wounds that is still horrific since they were all delivered in quick succession. Sorry but Dylan shot her first and killed her

I already read the autopsy. Dylan killed Lauren.

EthanEmerson wrote:

Redacted because it's just starting arguments.

Research for yourself. That's the whole point.

If you want to find something you will.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  Please don't delete things.  The whole point of the forum is to present evidence, discuss evidence, different view points, etc.  

Everyone is not always going to agree on things. BUT the whole point is to share thoughts and things you have found. While some will not see what you see, others definitely will.

I for one like to see things from all angles and research both sides.

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

EthanEmerson wrote:

Redacted because it's just starting arguments.

Research for yourself. That's the whole point.

If you want to find something you will.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  Please don't delete things.  The whole point of the forum is to present evidence, discuss evidence, different view points, etc.  

Everyone is not always going to agree on things. BUT the whole point is to share thoughts and things you have found. While some will not see what you see, others definitely will.

I for one like to see things from all angles and research both sides.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I hope you'll stay.  I really enjoyed your process of deduction here using the supporting forensic evidence.  It's good to take a look at things from another angle instead of just regurgitating the known facts. That's what this forum should be about instead of just being an echo chamber.  Even if people don't agree with your controversial take, it's interesting food for thought.

I'd prefer to wait until my site is relaunched and provide a link to the page on this matter so people can click on source links to look at the evidence first hand... it was stupid to post the summaries of what I found without being able to link directly to all of the evidence. I thought most people would be curious and say, "hmm that's interesting, let me go see what you're talking about" but that was not reality...

So, I'm not going to post anything that isn't a link that directly cites sources.

The point wasn't to get people to agree, but to be curious and look for themselves beyond what they think they already know...

I was in the same boat long ago. What I found was shocking. But there's no point to putting anything out there if it's not linking to the sources because nobody's going to do the research to verify it... many of the responses proved that immediately. (Not all, there are some authentic researchers here).

I just thought people might like to know some details that have been misunderstood for years. If I can't post here in the format that links to sources then I won't put it out there. It's not fair to do that because then it becomes an argument over proving points, right and wrong, hearsay, my evidence is right and yours is wrong, etc.

My research is HTML formatted and I don't have the time to translate it to forum shortcode.

Next year I'll link my site's relaunch link and people can have at it

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - I will repost when I've cited all sources from all angles and have verified everything again with fresh eyes. It's not fair to post something like this without citing all sources. I'm always in research and verification mode - I forgot some people aren't, and I don't want to do anyone's research for them but if I don't cite the sources that paint the whole picture, the people who don't care to re-research, ask questions, or verify what they "already know" - they will just keep arguing and it will take up space and time...

I'm not leaving, I'm just going to be responsible about what I post and not post anything I can't directly cite on the format of this board or via link to the formatted HTML.

:-D

EthanEmerson wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - I will repost when I've cited all sources from all angles and have verified everything again with fresh eyes. It's not fair to post something like this without citing all sources. I'm always in research and verification mode - I forgot some people aren't, and I don't want to do anyone's research for them but if I don't cite the sources that paint the whole picture, the people who don't care to re-research, ask questions, or verify what they "already know" - they will just keep arguing and it will take up space and time...

I'm not leaving, I'm just going to be responsible about what I post and not post anything I can't directly cite on the format of this board or via link to the formatted HTML.

:-D

GOOD! Looking forward to seeing everything you lay out.

Bye

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - :-D

There's way too much but I have to start somewhere! I rebuilt it three times in the past, this time is a piece of cake.