What's left to analyse ?

Ive been thinking , we analyse everything related to columbine .

We all have been kind of analysts , studying and scrutinize every single detail about columbine , in fact we all been doing what people usually get paid for like investigators , etc .

The fact that one of our users in forum revealed that e and d were caught on tape planting the bombs in the cafeteria is revealing enough .

So i ask , is there anything else to analyse about columbine ?

The only major topic to analyze is the transcripts from the lawsuit towards the parents of Klebold and Harris. That will be released in 2027. I am doubtful they will reveal anything significant.

I prefer not to think of it this way, that there may be nothing left. There's no limit to what we choose to analyse and talk about it especially since we know the boys too well and everything in the case. It's never too late for something to pop up, amazing things have happened in cold cases.

You can say that "everything has been covered", but as long as new people keep analyzing with different perspectives, there will always be something to talk about.

I think the only thing that's left is for the Harris family to come out of hiding and speak about Eric(which ain't gonna happen). That I feel would bring out a whole new perspective about Eric.

Evidence wise there is not much left to come out. But has anyone seen the latest CVA video? There are still many many things to talk about and discuss. There are tons of grey areas out there that people have different opinions on.

I have always wanted to hear what was on the some called "Nixon tapes." Is there anything of value on these tapes or is it just hype?

Jada887 wrote:

I have always wanted to hear what was on the some called "Nixon tapes." Is there anything of value on these tapes or is it just hype?

Eric said a bunch of things on it, so I would very much like to know what they were. It's just one cassette tape he left on his kitchen table.

Awwww, this is something I have been thinking about for a while.
Of course, this case is extremely exciting and well-documented enough so that we can have interesting discussions about it.
But lately, I began to feel that we have very little to analyse. This explains my lack of activity, sorry for that

We had this conversation some time ago regarding what was still missing, it's not everything but there is some interesting bits and pieces to look into.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Other than the Basement Tapes (which is nothing but the boy's playing for the camera) there isn't a whole lot left to go by. There's the parents depositions of course, but between Sue' s book and the published Mauser/Harris meeting we can surmise what those look like. Honestly there isn't anything left that will be "new". The cafeteria tapes were an exciting development, but then again it comes off as crawly "cover up" police work more than anything. I personally believe the answer to "why?" is there in the evidence we do have access to: Eric had an extremely bruised ego, while Dylan needed a serious means of ending his life. That doesn't make the case any less interesting, not do I see it being one I'll easily forget either. Ultimately it's just plain shocking that 2 high school kids could put in so much planning into destroying their school. The shocking and damn near story book nature of the case is what keeps us researchers interested.

I know a certain community would go crazy over new pictures, so perhaps leaks of the boys or unseen crime photos regardless the gore

Nirvana92 wrote:

Other than the Basement Tapes (which is nothing but the boy's playing for the camera) there isn't a whole lot left to go by. There's the parents depositions of course, but between Sue' s book and the published Mauser/Harris meeting we can surmise what those look like. Honestly there isn't anything left that will be "new". The cafeteria tapes were an exciting development, but then again it comes off as crawly "cover up" police work more than anything. I personally believe the answer to "why?" is there in the evidence we do have access to: Eric had an extremely bruised ego, while Dylan needed a serious means of ending his life. That doesn't make the case any less interesting, not do I see it being one I'll easily forget either. Ultimately it's just plain shocking that 2 high school kids could put in so much planning into destroying their school. The shocking and damn near story book nature of the case is what keeps us researchers interested.

Lots of teenage boys have bruised egos and although Dylan eventually had access to a gun, he still went through with the massacre anyway so I think this may be an oversimplified explanation.

shades wrote:

I know a certain community would go crazy over new pictures, so perhaps leaks of the boys or unseen crime photos regardless the gore

Oh man I would die to see those. I just can't get enough of the two boys.

"Lots of teenage boys have bruised egos and although Dylan eventually had access to a gun, he still went through with the massacre anyway so I think this may be an oversimplified explanation."

Sorry I can't do regular quotes on my mobile.

I don't think it's an "over simplified view" at all. Lots of depressive own guns, yet they still can't pull the trigger on themselves. It's not hard to see from Dylans writing tjat he held out hope for a very long time. He wasnt even certain he wanted to go through with NBK until a few weeks before the event. Sometimes i feel like, even after a year of planning, that NBK was still a spur of the moment kind of thing for Dylan. Eric knew for a long time he wanted to commit the massacre. Dylan on the other hand waited until there was "no hope" to go through with it. Once the deadline came and nothing in his life had changed he was willing to allow NBK tot force his hand in suicide. He could have put his Tec9 to his head at any moment. Instead he waited it out as long as he could, and even then it took mass murder to force his hand.

afrrs wrote:

Ive been thinking , we analyse everything related to columbine .



So i ask , is there anything else to analyse about columbine ?

Yes. The Harris's have remained quiet (respectfully so), the BT and other God only knows what evidence that hasn't been release from JeffCo. I sit, ponder and analyze routinely the tragedy of Columbine.