9/11 or Columbine?

At the beginning of my junior year in high school, in my English class the teachers showed us a video of the towers being hit. The kid next to me imitated the explosion and made a sound and gesture to go with it. He wasn’t the only one, I saw other kids laughing and making fun of it. The girl at the table next to us had to leave the room eventually because apparently she had lost her father on 9/11. This was in New York City, so I couldn’t believe how immature these kids were being!

9/11 and Columbine are close together in time but worlds apart in activities. You can't just say one is better because of body count can you? If that was the case then this would be redundant.

Never thought of putting myself in the shoes of the "jumpers". I figured I would of waited it out even though I would of probably known I wasn't getting out alive. I guess you had a choice: 1. Stay in the building, suffocate, get burned slowly and be crushed by the building or 2. Jump, have a last "rush" feeling and die instantly.

After thinking i'd probably choose [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] but would be terrifying as well

9/11 was far more dramatic than Columbine.

9/11 was a big extreme terrorist attack that shook a country causing an uprise in permanent war destination, Columbine was a start and inspiration for many with mainly mental health issues to declare war on a place they deemed unfit or deserving of violence in their mind