I dislike Eric and Dylan as people. Not because they committed the shooting

Like they were obviously Nazi social Darwinists. With all the natural selection and far right stuff. Also, the way they singled out Isaiah Shoels.
I don't really have a problem with the shooting itself because living in the society is a pvp game. People from outside of closest support group are enemies fighting for resources. Who will capture that workplace, who will capture these customers, who will capture that scholarship, who will live and who will die. Innocence is a myth. Killing is just a matter of willingness to pay the price, not really a moral problem. The existence of a silent war for survival is already pre-determined.
Of course in some countries it's not a matter of life and death, but even with welfare systems, one has to fight tooth and nail against the enemy hordes to get a decent life.
It's an interesting feeling to encounter enemies in war for survival for example on a group job interview and realise they are people just like oneself and their goals are directly opposed to one's survival.

Watcher wrote:

I don't really have a problem with the shooting itself because living in the society is a pvp game.

Then why do you care about their racism?

Fucking idiot

Amokauliflower wrote:

Watcher wrote:

I don't really have a problem with the shooting itself because living in the society is a pvp game.

Then why do you care about their racism?

Racism is about arbitrarily blobbing people together and disregarding their individual characteristics. It's a form of psychosis.

Amokauliflower wrote:

Fucking idiot

There's no contradiction in it. You can have a person with different skin colour inside your closest support group and people with similar skin colour who are various forms of enemy combatants - ranging from bullies to competitors for survival.

u obviously dont understand the pragmatic reality of distinct groups and conflicting interests between them ur dumb sorry mate. btw stop the video game jargon it's cringe asf.

Watcher wrote:

living in the society is a pvp game

How is what they did not "psychotic" then? they did something they knew would get them killed which is contrary to what ur saying u r a stupid dumb dumb retard

.

.

Amokauliflower wrote:

u obviously dont understand the pragmatic reality of distinct groups and conflicting interests between them ur dumb sorry mate. btw stop the video game jargon it's cringe asf.

Skin colours aren't distinct groups, you're delusional.

Ugh, blocked the schizos.

.

.

Watcher wrote:

Amokauliflower wrote:

u obviously dont understand the pragmatic reality of distinct groups and conflicting interests between them ur dumb sorry mate. btw stop the video game jargon it's cringe asf.

Skin colours aren't distinct groups, you're delusional.

unfortunately, the only difference between me and the average Portuguese speaking favela dwelling gang banger isn't that our skin is a different colour, and *shockingly*, this would make us a part of distinct groups 

Watcher wrote:

Ugh, blocked the schizos.

u just lost internet pvp game how does it feel to be an inferior being?

.

strange

Watcher wrote:

Like they were obviously Nazi social Darwinists. With all the natural selection and far right stuff. Also, the way they singled out Isaiah Shoels.
I don't really have a problem with the shooting itself because living in the society is a pvp game. People from outside of closest support group are enemies fighting for resources. Who will capture that workplace, who will capture these customers, who will capture that scholarship, who will live and who will die. Innocence is a myth. Killing is just a matter of willingness to pay the price, not really a moral problem. The existence of a silent war for survival is already pre-determined.
Of course in some countries it's not a matter of life and death, but even with welfare systems, one has to fight tooth and nail against the enemy hordes to get a decent life.
It's an interesting feeling to encounter enemies in war for survival for example on a group job interview and realise they are people just like oneself and their goals are directly opposed to one's survival.

Watcher wrote:

Also, the obligatory "you'll kill a few pieces of shit and you'll going to pay like for killing real people" pep talk.

Watcher wrote:

Dylan was a one person suicide cult and was good at manipulating people and exploited it to get a partner in crime. Note how Dylan had another angry buddy before that chilled out after he got a girlfriend. It's possible Dylan was "working" on him already and he basically avoided getting manipulated into committing mass murder-suicide with Dylan.
People don't realise that Dylan was basically like a non-trans version of Andrew Blaze.

Watcher wrote:

Like the society is a pvp game. The video game terminology is appropriate because the society treats itself like a video game that is about "winners" and "losers" (but with extensive cheating). The terminology may sound immature, but treating life like a game is the choice that the society made it speaks more of the society than of the commenter. Columbine was especially egregious because it was pay to win and extremely imbalanced. You needed to be a jock class and rich to "win" Columbine.
The game that Columbine played was especially outrageous because it actively sought to attract people that it assigned the "loser" position with theatre and science extracurricular classes. Additional cheating besides pay to win was that some players were abused until their mental health was destroyed.
When life is a game and there's so much cheating, treating it like Doom is malicious compliance (both complying to treating it like a game and complying to creating rules to others disfavour). Everything agrees with the spirit of the society.

Of course people with the game mentality will say that the shooters are losers. Well, not according to the kill-ratio.

Where have I heard all of this this before. Maybe [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Or [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] too:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] one more:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I know what you're thinking. "You're reaching QuestionMark, just because these two say the same things word for word and espouse oddly similar beliefs doesn't make them the same person." Maybe. But it sure is weird that they have the same favorite rampage killer and are even the same height.

Watcher wrote:

A few times during last several years I encountered a situation where I was either heightmogged or almost heightmogged and it was a quite unsettling experience. I can't even imagine how it's to be below 6'4".

Watcher wrote:

[Olga Hepnarova is] my absolute favourite. I really enjoy when the killers are so completely self-aware and honest about their motives.

Watcher wrote:

Funny thing is that I was going through the [Randy Stair] Suicide Tapes in 2018 on anniversary days.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Assuming this isn't the coincidence of the century, can I ask why you decided to return after telling everyone here that we should kill ourselves?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Real-Life wrote:

strange

Throwing stones in glass houses here.