Thoughts On Adam's Beliefs/Views? ( Anti-Natalism, Culture, Nihilism )

For any half-intellectual people here.

( His "Beliefs/Views" pertain more to the philosophical side of things. )

They're no different to what people post on this forum today. He was no ground-breaking philosopher to say the least.

Adam's views on pedophilia are often overlooked (apart from people accusing him of having some latent attraction to prepubescent children), but I've always believed his "On pedophiles and children" videos were incredible, even if I disagreed with some of his points. I would have loved to see that 'pbear' essay completed, too bad the more "refined" version was on the scratched HD.
Oh, no! now I'm in the red zone for pedophilia accusations, aren't I?

In trying to distance himself from the ever-loathed "culture", he's only ended up promoting (((their))) ideals. His views on pedophilia will surely become the norm in 10 or 20 years, give or take. America barely HAS its own culture nowadays, outside of what JewTube talking heads proclaim the current thing to be. And Anti-Natalism is rife, at least in some form; look at how many people are more content with raising an animal than a child. It's actually quite funny, the poster-child for what people will unironically believe in once the NWO is established killed 27 whites at an elementary school, but hear the system tell it, that Bushmaster just floated in on it's own!

Modernity blows.

I don't think they're anything groundbreaking, but I do agree that culture is coercive. The only winning move is not to play, or at the very least minimize your participation.

  

He basically has very similar views too the uni bomber

I think his views are correct. All of them.

NEXT STEP UP wrote:

In trying to distance himself from the ever-loathed "culture", he's only ended up promoting (((their))) ideals. His views on pedophilia will surely become the norm in 10 or 20 years, give or take. America barely HAS its own culture nowadays, outside of what JewTube talking heads proclaim the current thing to be. And Anti-Natalism is rife, at least in some form; look at how many people are more content with raising an animal than a child. It's actually quite funny, the poster-child for what people will unironically believe in once the NWO is established killed 27 whites at an elementary school, but hear the system tell it, that Bushmaster just floated in on it's own!

Modernity blows.

You exacerbate the exact thing he was criticizing by blaming the issue on a specific group of people's values. Would this world and all of its "degeneracy" (whatever that even implies) just disappear given a different system takes over? Since all of your values are subjective, this "NWO" is essentially no different that any other arcane system which you deem to be admirable.

You are criticizing one culture so that your own may thrive, when both are equally harmful and detrimental to humanity as a whole. Your cause is not noble, and at the end of the day, you're no better than the harbingers of this "NWO" you speak of.

I mean hes right on some stuff like culture and anti natal-ism. We do force culture onto kids at a young age.

Ahead of his time on a certain topic

Carnations wrote:

They're no different to what people post on this forum today. He was no ground-breaking philosopher to say the least.

I think most people, when they come across Adam for the first time, have never heard these kinds of beliefs before and ascribe great insight on Adam's part when the reality is much of it has been said before, particularly by Ted Kazcynski.

Shouberty wrote:

Would this world and all of its "degeneracy" (whatever that even implies) just disappear given a different system takes over?

This implies that different systems all act the same such that it would have no impact on human behavior, when the reality is that different systems can and do have dramatic consequences on how people interact with each other and how they live their day to day lives. Even "small" changes like altering divorce law or self defense statues has massive consequences on the way we think and act.

It's never been anything groundbreaking he's just rehashing shit other people have already said but Adams philosophy has this kind of mysticism around it cuz it's legitimised by the fact he murdered 27 people. Kind of like how Mainländer is remembered not really for his philosophy but more the fact he put it into action by hanging himself.

Antinatalism and nihilism contradict each other, I don't believe Adam was a nihilist since he had some morals, for example, "culture is bad."

He made some good points, nothing special though except for on pedophilia.

QuestionMark wrote:

Carnations wrote:

They're no different to what people post on this forum today. He was no ground-breaking philosopher to say the least.

I think most people, when they come across Adam for the first time, have never heard these kinds of beliefs before and ascribe great insight on Adam's part when the reality is much of it has been said before, particularly by Ted Kazcynski.

Shouberty wrote:

Would this world and all of its "degeneracy" (whatever that even implies) just disappear given a different system takes over?

This implies that different systems all act the same such that it would have no impact on human behavior, when the reality is that different systems can and do have dramatic consequences on how people interact with each other and how they live their day to day lives. Even "small" changes like altering divorce law or self defense statues has massive consequences on the way we think and act.

The impact on human behavior is irrelevant, as the produced behavior is achieved through the exact same means regardless of what system takes hold. Yes, differing values thrive dependent on the system which has been established, but they act as harmful vessels of value all the same.

I agree with a lot of his views, but I'm self aware enough to admit that his views were definitely heavily influenced by his mental issues and his childhood. Going through horrible things, or at the very least, living with multiple clashing untreated mental conditions, already will make someone not want to live. Put them into a home with a mother who is assuring you that the only help you need is her, and youll probably grow up thinking there really isn't all that much wrong with you, there's something wrong with the world. At least, that's the bluepill way of looking at it in my opinion. I think both things can be true at the same time, depending on who you talk to. But I could talk about this for hours.

He was right about sexuality, romance and culture.

i agree with a lot of his views including propedo statements