Put your tin foil hats on for this one.....

We have ours on

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I moved this topic, because it doesn't belong in the misc section. The conspiracy interpretation is now placed under Thoughts on the Shooting section.

Wow. The creators of South Park are actually Eric and Dylan and Rachel Scott is actually her own older sister as well as a now-famous porn actress. Interesting.

Still more credible than anything William Zabel has said about Columbine.

I....I can't even...I got nothing.

I come across some great stuff... Like the one guy on David Eich site came up with an elaborate story on RS giving IS a BJ then kissed DK some crazy stuff like that.... I'll have to find that one again.

deathmedic wrote:

I come across some great stuff... Like the one guy on David Eich site came up with an elaborate story on RS giving IS a BJ then kissed DK some crazy stuff like that.... I'll have to find that one again.

Lovely....

deathmedic wrote:

I come across some great stuff... Like the one guy on David Eich site came up with an elaborate story on RS giving IS a BJ then kissed DK some crazy stuff like that.... I'll have to find that one again.

People are so classy. The sad part is someone out there truly believes that.

GAAAWWWWWDDD

Falcolus wrote:

deathmedic wrote:

I come across some great stuff... Like the one guy on David Eich site came up with an elaborate story on RS giving IS a BJ then kissed DK some crazy stuff like that.... I'll have to find that one again.

Lovely....

I've seen this "theory" talked about a couple times before, but I've never seen a source for it. Not that I don't believe you. I'm just curious how or why someone came to this conclusion. It would be too "perfect" of a scenario. I mean come on, what are the odds all of them would cross paths on the day of the attack? E and D didn't even plan on going to the library. Its pretty sad how people have tried to put these theories out there. Its even sadder that someone out there will listen to it and believe it to be true.

Nirvana92 wrote:

I've seen this "theory" talked about a couple times before, but I've never seen a source for it. Not that I don't believe you. I'm just curious how or why someone came to this conclusion. It would be too "perfect" of a scenario. I mean come on, what are the odds all of them would cross paths on the day of the attack? E and D didn't even plan on going to the library. Its pretty sad how people have tried to put these theories out there. Its even sadder that someone out there will listen to it and believe it to be true.

It discredits the legitimate research and findings of legitimate researchers. That why theories like the one in the OP make my blood boil.

Juicy Jazzy wrote:

Nirvana92 wrote:

I've seen this "theory" talked about a couple times before, but I've never seen a source for it. Not that I don't believe you. I'm just curious how or why someone came to this conclusion. It would be too "perfect" of a scenario. I mean come on, what are the odds all of them would cross paths on the day of the attack? E and D didn't even plan on going to the library. Its pretty sad how people have tried to put these theories out there. Its even sadder that someone out there will listen to it and believe it to be true.

It discredits the legitimate research and findings of legitimate researchers. That why theories like the one in the OP make my blood boil.

Well, its all stupid, some people will go to extraordinary lenghts not to believe something whcih is very vividly true. I've seen it in many cases including holocaus denial.

As someone who knows both a columbine survivor and who knew a (nopw deceased) concentration camp survivior, I relaly do not buy into any of this conspiracy nonsense.

I believe there were things E &D said and did leading up to these tragic events, and even things that happened on the 20th that nobody will ever know or fully understand but that is as far as I go with any conspiracy around Columbine. I'm sure that other beliefs of conspiracies in history have been valid however.

PaintItBlack wrote:

I believe there were things E &D said and did leading up to these tragic events, and even things that happened on the 20th that nobody will ever know or fully understand but that is as far as I go with any conspiracy around Columbine. I'm sure that other beliefs of conspiracies in history have been valid however.

Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction...

Man I have been searching for the other one I found... I think it may be here in the forums too... At least I don't have 1,000s of posts to go through

Last night I was actually trying to think of my own crazy theory about Columbine (which is not true of course, just done for fun) and I came up with one really quickly. I thought up that Columbine was an attempt by Bruce Porter (the Scott family's church pastor) to increase the prevalence of Christianity in the US, as well as to bring Christian prayer back into US schools.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I thought up that Rachel was being groomed by her pastor and her parents for her own death. That Rachel had noticed Eric and Dylan's dark undertones in her media classes with them. That she convinced them, on her families/church's orders, to shoot her one sunny spring morning. That the boys had to ask her if she believed in God. That they had to shoot her after she said yes. That there had to be witnesses. That news all over the country would be all over it. That Bruce had to be at the forefront. That he had to minister her funeral. That it had to be televised. That millions of people would watch and millions would 'puck up Jesus' torch'.

But there was a mistake. Eric and Dylan wanted to go further than just shooting one person. That they had their own plan, to lay bombs. They weren't going to throw their lives away just to kill one person. They wanted to kill as many as they could. So they adjusted the plan in secret. They made bombs. So when April 20 came along and the bombs were planted, nothing happened. So they proceeded to the area where they would shoot Rachel. Instead of walking to her and shooting her non-fatally, then asking her if she believed in God as planned, they simply opened fire, killing her and moving of to the event in which we know already, up until their deaths.

Eric and Dylan had fucked up. But instead of letting the plan fall to pieces, those involved decided to save what was left, to proceed with the plan anyway. They convinced (or threatened) Richard Costaldo's mother to claim that Richard woke up claiming Eric had asked her about God and that he shot her when she said yes. They doctored the drawing that Rachel made with the thirteen tears. They proceeded with her live televised funeral, and Bruce was still able to give his emotionally charged 'stand up for Christianity' speech. Rachel's family, either in complete denial that the plan didn't go exactly as planned or in complete shock, kept peddling the lie that was Eric shooting her because she believed in God.

There are holes aplenty in my 'theory', but I think it would explain quite well why Rachel had all those suss death premonition entries in here diary, and which she kept referring to herself as a 'warrior for Christ'. I'm thinking I should get in touch with some of those nutty conspiracy radio shows like silly billy 'Willy' Zabel does to push this, what do you guys think?

^^ Go for it! I'm sure there's an audience for it in this crazy mixed up world of ours.