Santa Fe High School shooting leaves at least 10 dead, suspect in custody

I really wish they wouldn't sensationalize this in the news and go on another crusade against guns. It's only making things worse and banning guns won't stop school violence in the US anyway. There's been a lot of cases in Russia recently where kids went on stabbing sprees in school; they were also inspired by columbine but they used knives because guns are hard to get. Sure the death counts aren't as high but it's still gruesome. Why doesn't the media focus on the reason kids want to do these things in general?

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Derrick Bird would like to say hello.

Fox News is implying that video games made him do it.

Screamingophelia wrote:

I feel like that’s what i said. However in the US people just seem to want to ban guns and not look at the reason.

Because it's the weapon that kills. Someone can have all the rage in the world but if all they've got is their fists they won't get far.

QuestionMark wrote:

Fox News is implying that video games made him do it.

Good Grief!

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

Fox News is implying that video games made him do it.

Good Grief!

Yeah, you would think after years of this tired argument being discredited it would finally be put to rest, yet it still clings to life desperately.

UncontinuedProcess wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Derrick Bird would like to say hello.

Also Dale Cregan, Raul Moat, Liam Lyburd, Michael Piggin.

QuestionMark wrote:

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

Fox News is implying that video games made him do it.

Good Grief!

Yeah, you would think after years of this tired argument being discredited it would finally be put to rest, yet it still clings to life desperately.

Next will be the type of music he liked.

I am not surprised.

I'll wait a few days before making conclusions based on the news reporting on this case. They aren't trustworthy hours after the shooting.

Devil wrote:

I am not surprised.

I'll wait a few days before making conclusions based on the news reporting on this case. They aren't trustworthy hours after the shooting.

Hell, some aren't trustworthy months/years after a shooting.

Smiggles94 wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Anybody know if this dude has a police record or is this photo from today

I did an image search on Google with this picture. I got few results that matches the image, which may be an indication that this image is from today.

I am still uncertain if this is correct.

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Guns are invariably the main weapon involved in mass shootings, let's not compare apples with oranges.

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

ShadowedGoddess wrote:

QuestionMark wrote:

Fox News is implying that video games made him do it.

Good Grief!

Yeah, you would think after years of this tired argument being discredited it would finally be put to rest, yet it still clings to life desperately.

Next will be the type of music he liked.

Some people are picking apart the symbols he wore on his trench coat.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

He's just wearing that shit for shock value but the morons of the world have to push their narrative at all costs.

Dylan had a hammer and sickle on his boot. He's probably copying that i would imagine.

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

macks_ant86 wrote:

Guns are invariably the main weapon involved in mass shootings 

Huh no shit right there.

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

Wrong again.

A Nazi Communist Bisexual....

Tommy QTR wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

Wrong again.

Okay dude if you say so

W.A.R. wrote:

A Nazi Communist Bisexual....

Lmaoo the media will jump on anything

Smiggles94 wrote:

Tommy QTR wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

Wrong again.

Okay dude if you say so

You are though, the last mass murder in the UK was in 2010 and it's a proven fact that gun control doesn't work.

[quote="Smiggles94"]

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

No guns in england no shootings

There are lots of legally owned guns in England.

The black and white ribbon on the iron cross would date it to before the Nazi era who used red white and black.  

Those of us who have studied the columbine evidence recognize the small red Russian star as the same one Dylan wore on his boot.

Ziamber II wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

No guns in england no shootings

There are lots of legally owned guns in England.

Non that could kill a classroom full of kids before police can even be dispatched tho lol

A Shooter in a rural area could easilly kill 10+ people with a low capacity shotgun or rifle before the cops could even locate The Shooter.

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

How can I compare the multiple mass killings to the "isolated terrorist incidnets". Well, I can do that the same way you compare a country with 325.7 million people in it to a country that has 53.01 million

Ziamber II wrote:

A Shooter in a rural area could easilly kill 10+ people with a low capacity shotgun or rifle before the cops could even locate The Shooter.

Besides the point im making tho dude how would that situation happen and how rural would ot have too be its very rare no matter what comebavks you have too deny america has a gun problem is idiotic

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

How can I compare the multiple mass killings to the "isolated terrorist incidnets". Well, I can do that the same way you compare a country with 325.7 million people in it to a country that has 53.01 million

So your saying america doesnt have a gun problem ?

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

A Shooter in a rural area could easilly kill 10+ people with a low capacity shotgun or rifle before the cops could even locate The Shooter.

Besides the point im making tho dude how would that situation happen and how rural would ot have too be its very rare no matter what comebavks you have too deny america has a gun problem is idiotic

Alot of rural areas in England a Shooter could go unchallenged for a long time, remember Derrick Bird in 2010?

macks_ant86 wrote:

Screamingophelia wrote:

I feel like that’s what i said. However in the US people just seem to want to ban guns and not look at the reason.

Because it's the weapon that kills. Someone can have all the rage in the world but if all they've got is their fists they won't get far.

"Because it's the weapon that kills." well that is just fucking retarded.

Ziamber II wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

A Shooter in a rural area could easilly kill 10+ people with a low capacity shotgun or rifle before the cops could even locate The Shooter.

Besides the point im making tho dude how would that situation happen and how rural would ot have too be its very rare no matter what comebavks you have too deny america has a gun problem is idiotic

Alot of rural areas in England a Shooter could go unchallenged for a long time, remember Derrick Bird in 2010?

So you think america doesn’t have a gun problem ? Thats the point im making

Population Control wrote:

macks_ant86 wrote:

Screamingophelia wrote:

I feel like that’s what i said. However in the US people just seem to want to ban guns and not look at the reason.

Because it's the weapon that kills. Someone can have all the rage in the world but if all they've got is their fists they won't get far.

"Because it's the weapon that kills." well that is just fucking retarded.

How can sombody commit a mass shooting without guns jesus your logic is the only thibg thats retarded

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

How can I compare the multiple mass killings to the "isolated terrorist incidnets". Well, I can do that the same way you compare a country with 325.7 million people in it to a country that has 53.01 million

So your saying america doesnt have a gun problem ?

No, I don't think america has a gun problem. I don't think its fucking good, but I also don't think the media equally reports it, and I think they make shit look A LOT heavier then it really is. I don't think we have that big of a epidemic, and I don't think guns are the problem.

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

A Shooter in a rural area could easilly kill 10+ people with a low capacity shotgun or rifle before the cops could even locate The Shooter.

Besides the point im making tho dude how would that situation happen and how rural would ot have too be its very rare no matter what comebavks you have too deny america has a gun problem is idiotic

Alot of rural areas in England a Shooter could go unchallenged for a long time, remember Derrick Bird in 2010?

So you think america doesn’t have a gun problem ? Thats the point im making

No it doesn't, it has a mental health problem.

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

rebootoX wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  I live in Germany, we have very strict gun laws and we had only 3 school shootings here since 2000. I'm not saying that banning guns is the solution, but it's sure better than nothing (in my opinion). But the real problem is: Why do kids even WANT to shoot up their school? If we know the answer to this question, we can probably prevent a lot more shootings in the future.

Banning guns won't stop them, and man, even if guns were "banned" so many guns, like I say man, there would be waco and ruby ridge style shits happening all the time, cause Americans, they don't see banning guns as a good thing, the second amendment is put there to protect the rest, and if you wanna take that right, they won't stand for it. I mean, you live in Germany, funny that would would support taking guns, since that is what the nazis did before they took over your country. That is the way Americans see it. Also, gun bans won't work anyway, I mean, columbine happen during a "assault weapon ban"

No guns in england no shootings

Yeah, too busy having; Knife fights, mass stabbings (guess thats only one) bombings, bleach and other acids thrown into people's face, motherfucker running over other motherfuckers in vans, people getting beaten to death with blunt objects, and oh yeah, poison.

Not even to mention fire and molotovs.

Never in my life living in england have i know any of this too happen few terrorist attacks once a year or so not multiple mass killings in schools every week i mean come on the last mass murder other than terrorist incidents that every country gets was in 1996 and that was scotland not england.
How can you compare isolated terrorist incidents too americas gun crisis?

How can I compare the multiple mass killings to the "isolated terrorist incidnets". Well, I can do that the same way you compare a country with 325.7 million people in it to a country that has 53.01 million

So your saying america doesnt have a gun problem ?

No, I don't think america has a gun problem. I don't think its fucking good, but I also don't think the media equally reports it, and I think they make shit look A LOT heavier then it really is. I don't think we have that big of a epidemic, and I don't think guns are the problem.

Well the rest of the world thinks yous are insane

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

Exactly no guns no shootings i know shit happens in england but I personally have never seen a gun in person how many americans can say that

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

Exactly no guns no shootings i know shit happens in england but I personally have never seen a gun in person how many americans can say that

My god you're dense.

Tommy QTR wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

Exactly no guns no shootings i know shit happens in england but I personally have never seen a gun in person how many americans can say that

My god you're dense.

Your making me dense dude how could you shoot sombody without a gun.

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

I saw this news this morning and thought it was a 1 injured shooting. I then saw the at least 3 dead and i was like wow. I got home right now and saw 10 dead and my mouth dropped, holy shit

Smiggles94 wrote:

Tommy QTR wrote:

Smiggles94 wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

Exactly no guns no shootings i know shit happens in england but I personally have never seen a gun in person how many americans can say that

My god you're dense.

Your making me dense dude how could you shoot sombody without a gun.

You can still get a gun illegally.

Population Control wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

It could happen in the UK if someone gets an illegal gun or if someone throws a petrol bomb in a crowded room or something like that. I think it's the mental health problem here.

Population Control wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

How many school shootings this week dude come on your point is irrelevant.

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

How many school shootings this week dude come on your point is irrelevant.

Liam Lyburd and Michael Piggin were close to committing their shootings.

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

How many school shootings this week dude come on your point is irrelevant.

Last year, Northallerton could have become the 'New Columbine' IF TEHRE Plans worked out. Yorkshire has never had a Mass Shooting.

Smiggles94 wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

How many school shootings this week dude come on your point is irrelevant.

Smaller country, smaller population, but the city of london has been attacked 4 times last year, that is just one city, with a smaller population, that is my point.

eldigato wrote:

Population Control wrote:

Ziamber II wrote:

America does have a gun problem, it's almost 8 years since a Shooting as bad as this in the UK

2017 Westminster attack
2017 London Bridge attack
Finsbury Park attack
Parsons Green bombing


Maybe not shootings, but it has been attacked.

It could happen in the UK if someone gets an illegal gun or if someone throws a petrol bomb in a crowded room or something like that. I think it's the mental health problem here.

It could but what use is a gun its only purpose is too kill your only reason for having them is defence but if there were non you wouldnt need it too defend as they wouldnt have one

seems like a shotgun and a .38 revolver were used, not "assault rifles" they were taken from his dad so its his fault for leaving them out