What is the most you think a mass shooter could possibly kill?

The worst mass shooting by a single perpetrator was Anders Breivik, who killed 67 people with gunshots. What is the most you think a single shooter could ever possibly kill?

I think about 114 with guns alone in a Las Vagas type location, remember Anders Brievik also killed using bombs.

Rosie1756 wrote:

I think about 114 with guns alone in a Las Vagas type location, remember Anders Brievik also killed using bombs.

Paddy would have killed more people if he wasn't interrupted, during his trip in Las Vegas.
Even though he might have killed less people than Anders, he injured way more people in such a short amount of time compared to Anders.

Paddy the daddy definitely did more damage than Anders, as well as being a An Hero.
Which only complemented the fact that he's the most deadliest mass shooting in modern US history.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Depends on the method, people and environment.

A mass shooting/killing can happen anywhere at anytime if planned right someone might be able to go for the 1k (like the theory if Eric's bombs had worked it would have made at least 600 kills)

NookAndCranny wrote:

Depends on the method, people and environment.

A mass shooting/killing can happen anywhere at anytime if planned right someone might be able to go for the 1k (like the theory if Eric's bombs had worked it would have made at least 600 kills)

But that would have been bombing deaths, not shooting deaths.

DanielBryer wrote:

NookAndCranny wrote:

Depends on the method, people and environment.

A mass shooting/killing can happen anywhere at anytime if planned right someone might be able to go for the 1k (like the theory if Eric's bombs had worked it would have made at least 600 kills)

But that would have been bombing deaths, not shooting deaths.

Same thing. This topic is about mass killers/shooters not a gun game lobby.