Cullen: Why we fight

Why, after nearly six years, do we still talk about this man and his book?

Because, after nearly six years, his fangirls are still polluting the public discourse:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

We shall fight him on the beaches, we shall fight him on the landing grounds, we shall fight him in the fields and the streets, we shall fight him in the hills; we shall never surrender. We shall drive his drivel back into the pit from which it oozed. And we'll have fun doing it, too.

Or maybe we shan't ... but, at the very least, we the few shall stand and say, "We are contra-Cullenistas now and forevermore."

Quote :

But in reading up on that incident, he did not see that later investigations disproved early reports that the shooters had been bullied.

Disproved, my rear rump. Cullen's half-baked inanities aside, Eric and Dylan's true motives remain murky at best.

I might agree with all of your sentiments but damn, I love this post. I will never change my opinion on this man and his "book" and no amount of public pressure will make any difference.

The Wikipedia--article, imo, is a start, but hardly 100% reliable.

Start with Peter Langmann. Or this
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Norwegian wrote:

The Wikipedia--article, imo, is a start, but hardly 100% reliable.

Start with Peter Langmann. Or this
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

LPorter101 should start with Wikipedia article?

Ligeya wrote:

Norwegian wrote:

The Wikipedia--article, imo, is a start, but hardly 100% reliable.

Start with Peter Langmann. Or this
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

LPorter101 should start with Wikipedia article?

No, thats not the point. The article he posted suggested that the Wikipedia article is a good starting point. To a certain degree, but there are also some major inaccuracies being perpetuated in there.